Civil revision petition against an execution court order was listed for dismissal; the petitioner did not appear despite notice. The High Court dismissed the revision petition for default/non-prosecution with no order as to costs and closed pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[34451
IN THEHIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND.KUMARSHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALADEVI EADA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:155 OF 2005
Petition under Section1 15 of CivilProcedure code against the order dated 06-12-2004 Passed in E.P.No.5B2of 2004 in O.S.No.630of 2003 on the file of the Court of Principal Junior CivilJudge,Kothagudem.
Between:
Shaik Allabakshi, S/o. M.A.Gafoor, Deputy Plantation Managerin APFDCL, Kothagudem
...Petitioner
AND
...ResPondents
l.A. NO: I OF 2005(CRPMPNO: 178 OF 2005)
Petition under section151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in supportof the petition, the High court maybe pleasedstayof all furtherproceedingsin pursuance of the orders passed in EP No. 582 of 2OO4 dated: 06-12-2004in osNo. 630 of 2003 on the file of Principal Junior civil Judge, Kothagudem,pendingdisposal of the aboveCivil Revision Petition'
Counsel for the Petitioner:Sri R KameshwarRao(Not present)
Counsel for the RespondentNo.l: Sri M RajamallaReddy
Counsel for the RespondentNos.2 to 4 : - - -
The Court made the following:ORDER
1:€' !Gd
THE HON'BLE SRI IUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SMT.IUSTICE TIRUMALA DI]VI EADA
CML REVISION PETITION No.155 OF 200s
ORDER: (Per Hor-r'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili)
Despite listing the matter under the caption 't'or ciismissal',
there is no representation on behalf of the petitionr:r. Therefore,
, tl.ris Court has no other option except to disn riss the Civil
Revision Petition for default or non-prosecution
default. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Applications, if arry, pendinp; in tl"ris Civil
Revision Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/. P PADMANABHA DDY ASSiISTANT G TRAR
l
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
ADK/PR ry.
HIGH COURT
DATED:31 10112025
ORDER
CRP.No.155 of 2005
H E S,h
tr{
()o)+
2 7 ,iutl 2925
<,
o/..
,.n
DISMISSING THE CRP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
<br>(, c
17
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaik Allabakshi
Sriram Capital Finance and Chits, Kothagudem, rep. by Managing Partner M. Raghuramarao
The Divisional Manager, A.P. Forest Development Corporation Limited, Laxmidevipally, Kothagudem
Banoth Chandulal
K. Venkataramana
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
