Civil Revision Petition against an interlocutory order in a pending suit; respondent informed the Court the suit itself was dismissed on 16.07.2014, rendering the revision infructuous. The High Court dismissed the revision as infructuous with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Civil Revision Petition No.2754 of 2014
Civil revision filed under Anide 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the orderdated 10.O2.2O14passedinl.A.No.738 of 2013inO.S.No.274of 20l3onthefileof the ll Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
Between:
Tulip Telecom Limited, Rep by its Managing Director, lvlr.Hardeep Singh Bedi, having its office at Plot No.160, Okhla lndustrial Area, Phase-|, New Delhi
...Revision Petitioner/Defendant No.1/Petitioner.
AND
..Respondent No.1/Plaintiff/Respondent No.1.
...Respondent No.2/Defendant No.2./Resondent No.2.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP. NO: 3806 OF 2014
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay all further proceedings in pursuance oI the ex-parte decree dt. 161712014 passed in O.S.No.274 of 2013 on the file of the court of the ll Senior Civil Judge, CCC, Hyderabad pending disposal of the above revision.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri G.L.V.Ramana Murthy. (not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: Sri Shyam Sunder Murthy.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I t
i I I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
I
Cni IL REVISION PETITION No.2754 OF 20'14
I
ORDER: (Per I kn'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Shavili)
When thr: matter is taken up for hearing, learnl:d counsel for respondt:rrl. No.1 has informed the Court that the present Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the inlerlocutory order, daterl"10.02.20-14, passed in I.A.No.738 ot 2013 in O.S.No.274 <:f 2.01,3 by the learned II Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, H),derabad, and that the main Suit itself was dis;missed on 16.07.20"14, thrr; rendering the subject matter of the pr,.:sent Civil Revision Petition as infructuous.
2 There is no representation on behalf of the petitio ner
respondent .No.1, the Civil Revision Petition is disrnissed as
infructuous. J'here shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Applications, rt any, pending in this Civil
Revision Petition shall stand closed.
Sd/. A.SREENIVASA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
) )
i
HIGH COURT DATED:31 10112025
ORDER
CRP.No.2754 of 2014
!7'
1 trE Sl Al ('
(
,
oo)c 17 t.PF 2025 C
at
t o a
[,q| r. ;1r(
DISMISSING THE C.R.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
6
v(
4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Tulip Telecom Limited, Rep by its Managing Director, Mr. Hardeep Singh Bedi
Cambridge Technology Enterprises Ltd, Rep by its Director Mr. D.R.R. Swaroop
Axis Bank Ltd
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Tirumala Devi Eada
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
