Syed Wahed Ali Najafi @ Sohail Vs The State of Telangana

¶1

13217 1

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY^{OF MARCH} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^N.TUKARAMJI

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITiON NO: 3563^{OF 2025}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sved Wahed Ali Naiafi @ Sohail,^{S/o Sved HvdeAli Najafi,Aged about32} v6ars, Occ. Private^{-Emp-[oyee, R/o. H.No. 22-2-614, Panjaten Colony, Opp} iahangir Dairy, Left diA<i^{nat, 4th floor, Hyderabad. (Husbandof the} complainant).

¶9

Syed Hyder Ali Najafi, S/o^{late Syed Wahed Ali Najafi, Aged about.5'1 years,} Otc. private employee, R/o.^{H.No. 22-2'61-4,Panjaten Colony, Opp. Jahangir} oairy, Left side flat;4th floor, Hyderabad.^{(Father of Al .)}

¶10

MirzaYawer Hussain,^{S/o late Miza Masood Hussain, Aged about.47 yegrc.'} Occ. private employee, Fl/o.^{HussainiKoti, Opp.} .Lane^{Faraz Medical hall,} RangdliKhidki, Hydeiabad.⁽ Maternal/Paternal^{Uncle of 41} )

¶11

Sarveen Sultana, W/o^{HyderAli Najafi, Aged about. 41 years, Occ-'} Housewife, Ri./o. H.No. 22-2-614,^{Panjatirn Colony,Opp. Jahangir Dairy,Left} side flat, 4th floor, Hyderabad.^{(Mother of Al} ).

¶12

Sved Shabbir Ali Naiafi,^{S/o late Syed WahedAli Najafi,Aged about'45} v6ars, Occ. Househol-d,^{Rl/o. H.No.8'1-4021215,Gulshan Colony, Tolichowki'} Hyderabad. (Mater/Paternal Uncle^{of Al)}

¶13

Sved Hasnain Ali Najafi,^{S/o Hyder Ali Najafi, Aged about.25 years,Occ'} Birsiness, R/o. H.No.'22-2-614,-Panialen^{Colony, Opp. JahangirDairy' Left} side flat, 4th floor, Hyderabad.^{(Brotherof A1} )

¶14

Syed Qasim Ali Najafi, S/o^{HyderAli Najafi,Agedabo.ut. 26 yqar.s,} 9c9: Birsiness, R/o. H.trtci. 22-2-614',^{Panjaten Colony, Opp. Jahangir Dairy,Left} side flat, 4th floor,^{(Brotherof Al} )

¶15

SvedaSakinaFathima, D/o Hvder Ali^{Najafi, Aged about. 27 years,Occ'}

¶16

H6uienotO, R!/o. H.No. 22-2-614, Panjateri Colony, Opp Jahangir Dairy, Left side flat, 4th floor,^(Sister of Al ).

¶17

- Sved BLsiness, R/o. H.No. 18-7-306i139, Nahed Ali, S/o^{late Syed Yakub Aman Nagar, Hyderabad. (Pater/MaternalAli, Aged aboul.42 years, occ'} uncle of Al ).

¶18

..PETITIONEFI/ACCUSED

¶19

AND

¶20

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by^{its Public Prosecutor,HighCourt of} Telangana.

¶21

2 Smt. Soha Fatima, W/o Syed Wahed^{AR,Agedabout31 years, Occ..Pvt} Job, Fl/o. H.No.^{3-5-78212,Al Amodi Apartment, King Koti, Hyderabad.}

¶22

7

¶23

...RESPONDENTS

¶24

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in c.c. No. 5263 of 2024 u-nder sections 498-A, 406, 506, 323 of IPC and sections 3(1), 4 and 6 of Domestic Violence Act which is pending on the file of Hon'ble XV Additional chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Manoranjan Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad.

¶25

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2025

¶26

Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the f\rlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal p etition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C. No. 5263 ot 2024 under sections 498-A, 406, 506, 323 of lpC and sections 3(1), 4 and 6 of Domestic Violence Act which is pending on the file of Ho n'ble XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Manoranjan Complex, Nam pally, Hyderabad to meet the ends of justice

¶27

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of MR. MD ABU BAKAR SlDDlQ, tearned counsel for petitioner, MR. JTTHENDER RAO vEERAMALLA, Advocate for the petitioner and the Asst. public prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶29

i I I

¶30

\

¶31

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEN. TUKARAMJI}

¶32

CRIMI NAL^{PETITIONNo. 3563ot2025'}

¶33

ORDER

¶34

This Criminal^{Petition is filed under Section 528 of} Bharatiya^{Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' 2023 (tor short 'BNSS'} 2023') seeking^{quashmentof the proceedingsin C'C No'5263 of} 2024onthefileofXVAdditionalChiefMetropolitanMagistrate' Manoranjan^{Complex, Nampally' Hyderabad'against the} petitioners/accused^{Nos"l to 9'}

¶35

Heard Mr.^{MD Abu Bakar Siddiq' learned counselfor} petitioners and^{Mr.Jithender RaoVeeramalla' learned Additional} Public Prosecutor^{appearing for the respondent No'1-State'} 3. The petitioners^{are arrayedas accused Nos' 1 to 9 in} C.C.No.5263^{of2024 on the file of XV AdditionalChief} Metropolitan^{Magistrate, ManoranjanComplex' Nampally'} Hyderabad^{under Sections 498-4, 406' 506' 323 of IPCand} Sections^{3 (1), 4 and 6 (1Xb)of Dowry Prohibition Act'}

¶36

Learned^{counsel for the petitioners would submitthat} though the^{petitionersare resolved to face the proceedings' their} presence before^{the trial Court on each adjournment is causing} severe difficulty^{and effecting their employmentTherefore'}

¶37

)

¶38

NTR.J CRLP 3563 2025

¶39

prayed for dispensing with their personal appearance unless it is required for the proceedings and such direction would redress their grievance However, undertakes to personally appear as and when directed by the trial Court.

¶40

Learned Additional Public^prosecutor submits that there is no specific objection for the prayer, however pleaded for a direction for appearance of the petitioners on the material stages in the proceedings

¶41

Having regard to the submissions, subject to^. the petitioners' appearance through their counsel on every adjournment and the petitioners' personal appearance as and when directed by the Court, the personal presence of the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 9 in the proceedings of C.C.No.5263 of 2024 on the file of XV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Manoranjan Complex, Nampally, Hyderabad, is dispensed with. Additionally it is specified that any lapse in abiding the above conditions would automatically annul this order.

¶42