Accused sought quashing of a non-bailable warrant in a cheque-related criminal case under Sections 409, 420 and 506 IPC. The High Court directed him to appear before the trial court with a recall application on a fixed date and the magistrate to decide it the same day.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13217 |
IN THE HIGHCOURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTHDAYOF MARCH TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTYFIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN.TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL PETITIO NNO:3380 0F 2025
Between:
Sved Mohammed YounusBasha, S/o. LateAdoni Syed Ghouse Mohiddin, Aged ,6ort SA v"ii., Occ:Business, R/o.H.No.14-437,Ub'aidPlaza,Ananthapur,A P'
.PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
...RESPONDENTS/DEFACTOCOMPLAINANT
Petition under section 528of B.N.S.S., prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Grounds of criminalPetition,the Highcourt may be pleased to setaside the NBW issued by the HonourableXIV Additional Judge- cum-XVlll Additional chiefMetropolitan Magistrate,city criminalcourts, Secunderabadin Q.c.No.677ot 2023, dt.1210212025by recalling the warrant.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025
Petitio,n under section 528of B.N.S.S., prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition,the High court may be pleased to suspendthe operationof the NBW issued in c.c.No.677of 2023, dt.12lo2l2}25 by theHonourableXIV Additional Judge-cum-XVlllAdditional chief MetropolitanMagistrate, city criminalcourts,secunderabad, pending disposal of the above criminalpetition.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memoraldum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M JANARDHAN RAO. Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor for the . . State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following: ORDER
7
I I
I I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN.TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL PETITION No.3380 OF 2025
ORDER
Heard Mr. Ir/1. Janardhan Rao, learned counsel for thepetitioner and Mr.Jithender Veeramalla, learned AdditionalPublic Prosecutor, representing the respondent No.1-State.
2
\ /x.i
(. r.l'.+ )).\r) ol 1t))i
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed
I
To
PR
N^_
HIGH COURT
DATED:12103t2025
ORDER
CRLP.No.3380 of 2025
--a.-
,,./i oi: ' .-.;,1
,..'..
/ -n
-j 7*
.$
/-;
s.<br>o
a
$,
<br>,l
\1 ry ar1
DISPOSING OF THE CRL.PETITION
V
1 issue framed by the court
Should the NBW dated 12.02.2025 in C.C. No. 677 of 2023 be recalled or its operation suspended?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Syed Mohammed Younus Basha
The State of Telangana
Himanshu Bapana
N.Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
