Petition seeking quashment of FIR in a dowry/cruelty case; offences punishable with imprisonment below seven years and police had not issued notice under Section 35(3) BNSS. Court directed the Investigating Officer to issue notice and follow Arnesh Kumar guidelines, with petitioner to cooperate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERAB OOT",, THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
Between:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITlON NO: 3596oF 2025
Gunti _Yadagiri, S/o Venkataiah Aged about 35 years, Occ Contractor R/o H..No.202, Maruthi Nilayam Nilima Cheguri EndavJ ntrn1."., pipe Line, Raod Madeenaguda, Ranga Reddy district
...PETITIONER/AGCUSED NO. 1
AND
...RESPONDENT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 529 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal peiition, the High c;;;;;yi" pleased to Quash the FrR in crime No. 38 of 202s on the fire of fups rr ioiiia". (cyberabad) cyberabad/Ranga Reddy district rejisiered against ttre pefitilner r Accused No 1;
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2025
Petition under Section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumsiances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition,the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all and further proceedings including arrest of the petitioner/Accused No.1 in Crime No. 38 OF 2OZS On the file of p.S. WpS-tT Corridor (Cyberabad) Ran ga Reddy district pending disposal of the Criminat Petition.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon nea"iing the arguments of Sri M KESHAV YADAV' Advocate for the petitioner and sriJithendir Rao Veeramarra, nJor. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No 1, The Court made the fottowing: ORDER
i-r
HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICEN. TUKARAMJI
CRIMINAL PETITIONNO.3596of 2025
ORDER
ThisCriminalPetitionisfiledunderSection52SofBharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita,2023(for short 'BNSS, 2023') seeking quashmentof the proceedings in Crime No.38 ofPolice Station, WPS-ITConidor' Cyberabad' Ranga Reddy Diskictagainst the petitioner/accused No 1'
\ \
ii I I I I I
.)
7 . Having regard to the fact that the alleged offences are punishable with an imprisonment of berow seven years and as the petitioner/accused No. 1 is ready to engage himsef in the process, without going into merits of the matter, the lnvestigating Officer concerned is directed to issue notice under Section aS 1a) of aruSS, 2023 in crime No'38 of 2o2s against the petitioner/accused No.1 and conduct proceedings as per the guidelines of Arnesh Kumarv. Sfafe of Biharr scrupulously. ln unison, the petitioner/accused No.1 shall cooperate with the investigation.
B. With this direction, this Criminal petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand
d closed.
SD/. L.VIJAYA LAXMI S TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
Y t+t+
t (2Ot4) 8 scc 273
HIGH GOURT
DATED:1310312025
o F 'i rlE S 14 /6.
o)+ (
o 2 3 JUlr 2U5
ai
.inAT C ii r-o
ORDER
CRLP.No.3596 ot 2025
DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION (l-L ( \ D;
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar v. State of BiharApplied¶7
Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 · Who else cites this
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Gunti Yadagiri
The State of Telangana
Gunti Eaghya Laxmi
N. Tukaramji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
