Dismissed¶25

Mr.Guna Vamsi Krishna v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC12 Mar 2025CRLP/5115/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Quash petition (S.528 BNSS; cause title recites S.482 Cr.P.C.) by M.T. Guna Vamsi Krishna against C.C. No. 8841 of 2022, IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, under s.66(c) Information Technology Act, 2000-2008. Respondents: State of Telangana (Public Prosecutor), State Police (Cyber Crime P.S., Cyberabad, IO Sri K. Srinivas), and complainant RVR Chowdary (no appearance for R.2 and R.3). Dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the cause had become infructuous; no ruling on merits; procedural disposal only, of limited precedential value.

What did the court decide?

Recording learned counsel's submission that the cause in the Criminal Petition had become infructuous, the Court dismissed the Criminal Petition as infructuous without adjudicating the quashment prayer on merits. ¶25

Mr.Guna Vamsi Krishna Vs the State of Telangana — Telangana HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[^!217 )

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5115 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

MT.GUNA VAMSI KRISHNA, S/o.Soma Ramesh Babu, Age about 44 years , Occ.Un-employed, R/o.Plot No.923 .and 924, Flat No.201, PNR Usha Residency, Street No.24, HMT Swarnapuri Colony, Miyapur, Hyderabad - 500 049

¶9

... Petitioner/Accused

¶10

AND

¶11

THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

¶12

THE STATE POLICE, Through Sri.K.Srinivas, lnvestigating Officer, Cyber Crime P.S., Cyberabad.

¶13

RVR CHOWDARY, S/o.R.P.Chowdary, Aged 68 years, Occ.Chairman, RVR Groups, RVR Digital lnfrastructures Limited,

¶14

...Respondents/Complainant

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the C.C.No. 8841 of 2022 on the file of lX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, for the offences under sections section 66(c) of lnformation Technology Act, 2000-2008 as the same is untenable either on facts or under law

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the C.C.No. 884'l of 2022 on the file of lX Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, for the offences under sections section 66(c) of lnformation Technology Act, 2000-2008 as the same is untenable either on facts or under law

¶18

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing tre Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M KRTSHNA CHAITANYA, Advocate for the petitionef and the public prose:utor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and None appeared for the Respondent No. 2 and 3.

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

)L').ti

¶21

¶22

HON'BLE SR! JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5115 OF 2024

¶23

JUDGMENT:

¶24

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashment of the proceedings in C.C. No.884'l of 2022 on the file of leamed lX Metroplitan Magistrate, Kukatpally. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the causein this Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶25

Recording the said submission, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

¶26

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶27

SD'. A.V.S.^PRASAD D PUTY^REGISTRAR

¶28

,/TRUE^COPYI/

¶29

ECTION^OFFICER

¶30

To,