A Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition seeking quashal of a complaint in C.C.No. 447 of 2021 was dismissed for non-prosecution after repeated adjournments with no representation by or on behalf of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33031
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSANO AND NA/ENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS
Between:
...PETTTTONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS
Petition under Section 482 of Cr. P. C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased totoquash the Complaint in C.C.No. 447 ol 2021 on the fite of Honble XIV AdditionalMetropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Rajendranagar and pass
2
... PETITIONER\RESPONDENTS NO.2
AND
... RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER/ACCUSED
PetitionunderSection4S2ofCr.P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition'theHighCourtmay ["'oLa."aTo vacate the orders dl: 27 tO4l2O21in I A NO'1/2021in CrlP No.i366/2021 theinterestofjusticeand pass
21
Petitionundersection4S2ofCr.P.Cprayingthatinthecircumstances statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofcriminalPetition,theHighcourtmay io .irv allfurther proceedings..includingappea.rg.n-c? .91.th: ;;';;;"il i.tition"rln".rsedin c.c.trto.447 0l 2021 0n the file of HonbleXIV Additional [,iliil;iH'Mrii.tr"t".cyberabad at Raiendranagarpending disposalof Criminal Petitionin the interest of Justice
This Petitioncomingon for hearing, upon perusingthe Memorandumof Grounds ofcriminal Petition and upon hearingthe argumentsof sri THADIKoNDAKoTESHWARAPRASAD,AdvocateforthePetitionerandMS.J Anusha learnedcounselrepresentingSRI M VIVEKANANDA REDDYthe AssistantPublicProsecutor(TG)onbehalfoftheRespondentNo.2andofSriB. SUDHAKAR REDDYAdvocatefor the Respondent No'
The Court made thefollowing:ORDER
l I
l \
I i
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
ORDER:
Ms.J.Anusha, learned counsel representing Sri B.sudhakar Reddy, leamed counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr.M.vivekananda Reddy, learned Assistant Puhlic Prosecutor for respondent No.2, are present.
\ \
2
I I
t,II I
Consequently, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending
shall stand dismissed.
SD'.M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
/
/
To,
//TRUE COPY//
G
SECTION OFFICER
w
Two CD Copies
PK/PSL
\
l l
HIGH COURT
DATED:0711012025
1nE SI,.
ra
-)
.J v7-
O 9 JAN 2[28
t <br>
DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION
CRLP.No.3366 of 2021
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ch. Surender Reddy
Pothuganti Raju
The State of Telangana, rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad
J Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
