Contempt case alleging willful violation of interim orders suspending appointment of a Person-in-Charge of a Primary Agriculture Cooperative Society. Respondents' counsel stated compliance; cause did not survive and the contempt case was closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 980 OF 2025
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take the contempt on its file and issue notice to the respondents and punish the respondents under the Contempt of Courts Act for their deliberate and willful disobedience of the orders passed in LA.No. 1 and 2 of 2025 in W.P.No. 7044,7050,7077,7078,7081 ol 2025 and batch dated 13.03.2025
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI A PRABHAKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE K.SARATH
CONTEMPT CASE No.98O of 2025
ORDER:
This contempt case is {iied against the action of the respondents in willful violation of the order passed by this Court in I.A.Nos. I and 2 of 2025 in W.P.No,7O50 of 2025, dated 13.03.2025, whereby this Court granted interim suspension of the proceedings 1n Rc.No.871912018,P.V, dated 24.02.2025 issued by the respondent No.2 and conscquential proceedings issued in Rc.No.l29 12O25-C, dated O1.O3.2025 issued by the respondent No.4 in appointing the respondent No.6, as Person-in-Charge of respective PAC S s forthwith
thereby, the cause does not survive for further adjudication ald no further orders required to be passed in this contempt case.
4 Miscellaleous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/- T, JAYASREE DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
.1 One CC to SRI A PRABHAKAR RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP FOR COOPERATION, High Court for the State of Telangana lourl
SM/PSL
\q-
HIGH COURT
I
DATED: 2010612025
ORDER
CC.No.980 ot 2025
.,1;!1nc Ie o
('
t
28[lJBzffi
5,
*
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
G d?q./<br>-6 -
6do
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Muddasani Satyanarayana Reddy
Chinthakindi Vamshi Krishna
Jangili Babu
Junnuthula Rama Devi
Majjiga Rambabu
Manchala Saritha
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
