Contempt case alleging willful disobedience of interim orders suspending proceedings appointing a Person-in-Charge of PACSs; counsel jointly submitted the orders were complied with, and the Court recorded this and closed the contempt case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN .. THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE AT HYDERABADOF TELANGANA
FRIDAY, THETWENTIETHDAYOF JUNE TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK' SARATH
CONTEMPT CASENO : 976oF 2025
Contempt Casefiled Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contemptof CourtsActlgTlprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfile herein theHigh Court rry O" pleased to take the contempton its file and issue notice to therespondents ani irni.r,the respon.dents underthe contemptof CourtsActfortheiraetioerateandwillfuldisobedrenceoftheorderspassedin i,q-nr" r and2 of 2025inW.P.No. 7077of 2025 dated13'032025
Between:
-7
...Petitioners
AND
Counsel for the petitioner(s): SRI A PRABHAKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR COOPERATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
,iG:tF."7"ta1! ,,{ . -.: - :Y
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH coNTEMPTCASE No.976of2025
ORDER:
This contemptcase is hled against the action of the respondentsin willfulviolationof the order passed by this Court inI.A'Nos. Iarrd' 2 of 2025 in W'P'No'7O77of 2025, d'ated'13.03.2025,wherebythis Court granted interim suspensionof the proceedingsin Rc.No.8719/20i8,P.V,d'aLed' 24'02'2025 issued by the respond.entNo.2 and consequential proceedingsissued in Rc.No. t2gl2O25-C,dated O|'O3'2O25 issued by the respondentNo.4 in appointingthe respondentNo'6'as Person-in-Chargeof respectivePACSsforthwith'
thereby, the cause does not survive for further adjudication arld no further orders required to be passed in this contempt case.
4 Misceilaneous petitions, if aly, pending shall stand clo sed.
\
Sd/. N, SRIHARI DEPUTY REGISTRAR
( (',
//TRUE COPYII
To
SECTION OFFICER
'1 . One CC to SRt A PRABHAKAR RAO, Advocate tOpUCl 2 Two ccs to Gp FoR coopERArtoN, ni'gh co*t i"; th'" state of rerangana louTl 3. Two CD Copies
SM/PSL
v t
HIGH COURT
DATED: 20t0GtZO2S
<br>
ORDER
S
€ (
tO
1E SEP :I2$
(-
* .).
i)p
S'r- \a ' ,\ " -/-''
CC.No.976 ot 2025
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE fA
6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukine Rajeshwar Rao
Nalla Shyamsundar Reddy
Suravu Sanjeev Rao
Merou Raju
K. Surendra Mohan
Neeraja
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
