Contempt case alleging non-compliance with a writ order directing consideration of representations for retirement dues. Respondents filed compliance and a reply detailing entitlements and payments made; the court held the directions were complied with and closed the contempt case without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321s J
IN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE SIXT€ENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUST.ICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
CONTEMPT CASE NO:667 oF 2024
contempt case liled Under Secrions l0 to l2 of contempt of courts Act, l97l ro punish the respondenrs hcrein fbr willfully, deliberately violating the orders of the High Court dated 09.08 2023 passed in W,P. No. 21180 of 2023.
Between:
P.Manohar, S/o Late P.Bhaskar., Aged.68 years occ. Drvnr.-Accounts officer (W) (Retired) H No 8-8-'13^3, N-S-L^ ^C-o!ony - phase-ll Ameenpur Municipatity, Ameenpur (M) Sangareddy Dist. 5O2 032
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P MANOHAR (PARTY-|N-PERSON)
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI S RAHUL REDDY SPECIAL Gp REPRESENTING ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T.MADHAVI'DEVI
CONTEMPT CASE NO. 667 OF 2024
ORDER:
This Contcmpt Case is tiled alleging willful and deliberate ctisobedience of thc directions of this Court in W.P.No.2l48O of 2023, dated 09.08.2023 and. is seeking punishmenr- lor the said disobedience under the Contempt of Courts A<:t and ro pass such other order or orders in the interest of justicc.
2
respondents/contemnors,but there was no response from them and thereafterhe also made a representation on O5.O1.2O24, but invain and therefore, the contemptcase has been filed.
3
@i-',--.,.'t{}:tfa: :.
that the respondents have complied with the directions of this Court and in respect of the payments which the petitioner tLas not received, thcy have given a reply dated 3i.05.2025. The petitioner is at liberty to challenge the same, if he is so aggrieved.
shall be no order as to costs.
stand closeC.
SD/. K. SREERAMAMURTHY E UTY REGISTRAR s //TRUE COPY// J S CTION OFFICER
\
To,
SS/gh
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 610712025
ORDER
CC.No.667 of 2024
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents willfully disobeyed the High Court's writ directions to consider the petitioner's representations regarding payments due to him.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P. Manohar
K. Ramakrishna Rao
V. Phani Bhushan Sharma
T. Madhavi Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
