Disposed

G. Sheetal v. Sri N. Sridhar, I.A.S

Telangana HC4 Jul 2025CC/365/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of a writ order. Respondent No.2 produced speaking orders dated 08.05.2025 said to be in compliance; the petitioner sought liberty to challenge those proceedings. The Court closed the contempt case without costs, leaving the petitioner free to challenge the fresh proceedings if aggrieved.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; no order as to costs; liberty to challenge proceedings dated 08.05.2025.

G. Sheetal Vs Sri N. Sridhar, I.A.S — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

-<----=-

¶2

[^{3301 ]}

¶3

oF TELANGANA rN rHE^HiGH ""uTf3$otl*tot"tsE

¶4

FRIDAY ,THE^{FOURTH DAY OF JULY} NTVO THOUSNND^{ANDTWENTY FIVE}

¶5

, PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEPULLAKARTH1K}

¶7

CONTEM PT^{CASENO:3650 F 2025}

¶8

Contempt^{Case filed Under Sections 10 to '12 of Contemptof CourtsAct'} 1971 to^{call the respondenUcontemnorsin person and ounishthe respondents} herein^{for willfullywantonlv'';;';;i;;;;telvviolatedthe orders this Court dated} 'ii|t-zd,zi i^stLo in w.p No' 32105 ot 2024'

¶9

Between:""ilsft"fs:rP,l?":ft :Li"-A%",',t?i$J3ili,ti'u9!?,,lP'l#ilfl^LII:$'""1 (M) Kama ReddY^District

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

1 Sri N. Sridhar,^{l.A.S, Principle Secretary'SocialWelfare Department} 5.ir.ti,irt^{aultaing,HYderabad'}

¶13

2 R*,3J.ilY?*,"*1',',il:'"it3;;,?i?iE'SBiIsli!:T'i"-"#3'#'9fl^:?"..' tvlasab Tank,^HYderabad

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SRI M KRUPAKAR}

¶16

Counsel^{for the Respondent No'1:G P FOR SERVICESlll}

¶17

Counsel for^{the Respondent No'2: SRI BHANOTHU HUSSAINSC FOR} TSWREIS

¶18

The Court^{madethe following:ORDER}

¶19

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶20

CONTEMPT CASE No.365 0F. 202s

¶21

ORDE R:

¶22

This Contempt Case is filed, under Section 1O to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 197 1, alleging wiliful disobedience of the order dated lg.lI.2024 passed by this Court 1n W.P.No.32 105 of 2024.

¶23

2 When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Bhanothu Hussain, iearned Standing Counsel for Telangana Social Welfare Residential Educational Institutions Society, appearing for respondent No.2, submits that in compliance of the order, dated 18 .71 .2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.321O5 of 2O24, ls5pendent No.2 issued speaking orders ulde procgs. Rc. No. c/32 I 0 s / 2024, dated 08. o5. 202 S

¶24

At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner sought liberty of this Court to challenge the proceedings, dated 08.05.202S.

¶25

Having regard to the above made submissions, this Contempt Case is ciosed. However, the petitioner is at liberty

¶26

¶27

PK,.J
cc 365 2025
i.

¶28

to challenge^{theproceedings, dated 08'05'2O25'ifso}

¶29

aggrieved.

¶30

' Miscellaneous petitions, if any'^{shall stands closed'}

¶31

There shall^{be no order as to costs'}

¶32

SD/-P.GOWRI^SHANKAR DEPUW^REGISTRAR

//TRUE^COPYII

oFFlcER fEcTloN

To.'"', On" CC to SRI M KRUPAKAR Advocate tOlygf 2 One cc^{to sRl BHANOiiuHUSSAIN Sb F-O^T TSWREIStoPUCl} 3. Two ccs^{to G p roriilnirCEslir'HrcH couRr FoR THE srATE oF} TELANGANA [OUT]

¶37

Two CD^CoPies

SSiPSL

\q/

i I I

HIGH COURT

DATED:04 tO7t2O2S

ORDER

..,\,.-/. I ii: ':.-
'/:
(,
l'l
i, 10 ffp W
1.

¶45

CC.No.36 S ot 2025

¶46

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS

¶47

#,d4
&r."

G. Sheetal v. Sri N. Sridhar, I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Sheetal v. Sri N. Sridhar, I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Suguna Metals Pvt.Ltd Vs the M.D., Apcpdcl., and 3 Others

Emmadi Ramarao Vs State of Telangana

Sri. Puram Gopi krishna Vs The State of Telangana

R. Chaitanya Vs Dr. B. Ravinder Naik

P.V. Naga Lakshmi Vs Sri E.V. Narasimha Reddy, I.A.S.

Shaik Kaleel Vs State of Telangana