Disposed

R. Chaitanya v. Dr. B. Ravinder Naik

Telangana HC4 Jul 2025CC/1342/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt case alleging wilful disobedience of a High Court order in W.P.No.17354 of 2024. Government Pleader submitted compliance orders had been issued dated 06.03.2025; the court closed the contempt case without costs, leaving the petitioner free to challenge the proceedings if aggrieved.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed without costs; liberty granted to challenge the compliance proceedings dated 06.03.2025.

R. Chaitanya Vs Dr. B. Ravinder Naik — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2025)

¶1

¶2

[³³⁰¹ ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

FRIDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶7

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1342 OF 2025

¶8

Contempt Case filed Under Sectrons 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for wilfully violating the Orders of the High Court dated 11.O7.2024 passed in W. P. No. 1735412024.

¶9

Between:

¶10

R. Chaitanya, S/o R. Narasimha Ramulu, aged about 53 years, Occ Administrative Officer M. G. M. Hospital, Warangal

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

Dr. B. Ravinder Naik, Director Public Health and Family Welfare, Telangana State, Hyderabad.

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Sri Kishore Kumar, Superintendent, M.G.M.Hospital, Warangal

¶16

(Leave granted to implead R2 as per Court Order dtd.27.06.2025 in lA No 1/2025 in CC No.134212025)

¶17

,..PROPOSED RESPONDENT

¶18

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to implead the proposed respondent 2 herein as party respondent No.2 in this contempt case in the interest of lustice.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D RAMAKRISHNA

¶21

Counsel forthe Respondents: G P FOR SERVICES I

¶22

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶23

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

¶24

CONTEMPT CASE No.1342 OF 2025

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

'['his Contempt Case 1S filed, under Sectrorr rO to 12 of Cont('mpI ol Courts Act, 1971, alleging willful disobeclierrcc of the orcler dated ll.O7 .2024 passecl by this Court in W.P.No. 17354 of 2024

¶27

When the mattcr is taken up for hcrrri:'rg, learncd Government Plc:rdcr ft>r the respondents, sr.lL-,mlts tha( in compliancc o[ thc order', dated I I .O7 .2024, passecl trv -his Court in W.P.No.17351 of 2024, thre lespondents issued socaking orclers uide l)rocet-dir-rgs No. 5O3O / G AD -MZ I I 2025, dated Otj. tt3. 2O25.

¶28

I-Iaving regard to the above made submission, tlris Contempt Casc is closcd. Howevc-r, the petitiotler is at liberty to i:hallengc the procccdings, clatcci O6.03.2O25, if so aggrieved.

¶29

Mis<:cll:rneous petitions, if any, shall stands closcd. There

¶30

shall be no order :ls to costs.

¶31

Sd/. T. VIJAY^KUMAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR

¶32

//TRUE COPY//

¶33

¶34

One^{CC to SRI D RAMAKRISHNA, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶35

Two^{CCsto G P FORSERVICESl, HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF} TELANGANA [OUT]

¶36

Two^{CD CoPies}

SSish .<-

HIGH COURT

DATED:04107 t2025

ORDER

i i.4 t (.)
t-)
',) 0 3 sEP 2025
S /,,1

¶42

CC.No.1342 of 2025

¶43

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE

¶44

WITHOUT COSTS

¶45

6
/-S.

R. Chaitanya v. Dr. B. Ravinder Naik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R. Chaitanya v. Dr. B. Ravinder Naik

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S.Suguna Metals Pvt.Ltd Vs the M.D., Apcpdcl., and 3 Others

Emmadi Ramarao Vs State of Telangana

Sri. Puram Gopi krishna Vs The State of Telangana

G. Sheetal Vs Sri N. Sridhar, I.A.S

P.V. Naga Lakshmi Vs Sri E.V. Narasimha Reddy, I.A.S.

Shaik Kaleel Vs State of Telangana