Partly allowed

Regunta Jagdhesh Kumar v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Apr 2024WP/8489/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 regarding the inaction of the Revenue Department in processing his e-passbook application for land in Mancherial District. The High Court directed the District Collector to consider the application within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's online application dated 25.01.2024, issue notice to affected parties, and pass a reasoned order within eight weeks.

Regunta Jagdhesh Kumar Vs State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

A[ 3168 I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE SECOND^{DAY OF APRIL} TWO THOUSAND AND^{TWENTY FOUR}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICEK.LAKSHMAN}

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 8489^OF2024

¶7

Between

¶8

Reounta Jaodhesh Kumar,^{S/o R.KomurarahAgedabout42 years Occprivate} "rni,iovu" ft'4ancherial^ilo district^{H.No.2o-3b/21,RK Five colony Naspur villageandmandal}

¶9

...pETlroNER

¶10

ANO

¶11

'1. State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶12

The District Collector,^{Mancherial District.}

¶13

The Tahasildar,^{Naspur Mandal, MancherialDistrict}

¶14

..RESpONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Atlicle 226^{of the Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances^{statedin the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High courtmay be pleased} to issue wflt order or^{direction moreparticularlyone in the natureof writ of} mandamus declaring the^{inaction of the respondentNo 2 and3 in consideringthe} dharani application^{"rid"No.24OOOO22\3 daled25tO112024for issuanceof E pass} books and tncorporating^{the nameof the petitionerin dharani portalfor the landin} survey No. 72lAl22t1^{JxtentAc3.OO gts situatedat Naspurvillage, andmandal'} Mancierral District as^{arbitraryand illegal and contraryto the provisionsof the} Telangana Rights in^{lands and pattadar pass books Act 2020 consequentlyto drrect} tfre rJsponde-nt No.^{2 and 3 to considerthe the dharanr appliccationvide No} 24OOOOi2g3 daled^{2SlOl1ZOZ4forissuanceof E pass booksand incorporatingthe} name of the^{petitionerin dharani portal for the land in survey No.721N2211exlenl} Ac 3.00 gts situated at^{Naspurvillage, and mandal, MancherialDlstrict'}

¶16

lA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶17

Petrtron under Section^{151 CPC praying thatin the circumstancesstated in} the affidavrt filed in support^{of the petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct} the respondent No.2 and^{3 to considerthe the dharani appliccationvide No} 24OOOOi2S3 dated Zsl1i^{t2O24 for issuanceof E pass booksand incorporatingthe} name of the^{petitionerin dharani-portalfor the land in surveyNo' 721N2211exlenl} Ac 3.OO gts situated at^{Naspur village,and mandal, Mancherial Districtpending} disposal of the above^writpetrtion

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRI GUDI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY} Counsel for the Respondents:^{SRI SOMU SRINIVAS REDDY,AGP FOR REVENUE}

¶19

The Court made the following:^ORDER

¶20

I I

¶21

I I

¶22

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN

¶23

WRIT PETITION N0.8489 of2024

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Heard Sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy, leamed counsel for the pctitioner and Sri Somu Srinivas Reddy, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Revenue.

¶26

The petitioner herein is claiming that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.3.00 gts in Sy.No.72lAl22r'1 situated ar Naspur Village, Mancherial District. In proof of the same, he has filed old pattadar passbooks and title deeds. He submitted online application No.02T2 12600001 765 dated 25.01.2024 with respondent No.2 with a request to issue e_passbook and title deed. Having receiving and acknowledging the said online application, the 2nd respondent did not act upon the same. Therefore, the present Writ Petition.

¶27

Whereas, learned Assistant Govemment pleader for

¶28

Revenue on instructions would submit that the 2,,d respondent will consider the said online application submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶29

-(rc
\4
\ . 'i: .',. :

¶30

¶31

In the light of the aforesaid submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 2"d respondent to consider the aforesaid online application No.02T2 1 26000017 65 dated 25.0 1.2024 submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, by putting the petitioner and all effected parties on notice and affording him an opportunity. If, the 2"d respondent is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioner, he shall assign specific reasons and pass a reasoned order, communicate copy of the said order to the petitioner. He shall complete the said exercise within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶32

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the

¶33

Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶34

¶35

SD/.^{N. CHAN DRASEKHAR RAO} ASSIS^{TANT REGIS} //TRUE^COPY// SECTIO OFFICER Secretariat, To, The Princtpal^{Secretary' Revenue Department' Stateof Telangana'} 2 3 4 5 il'#:isl+l':':"*iHiij!d?r3r.'.","n"". at Hyderabad. [OUT] 0 Two CD^Copres Snr GJP

¶36

HIGH COURT

¶37

DATED:02l0412024

¶38

'ti1c
(
ORDER
{ frAY 2[A o2
WP.No.8489 of 20242024 t
;);:: .-l r.'].-i C ':ii:"'
j---

¶39

WP.No.8489 of 20242024

¶40

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶41

)ro<br>

Regunta Jagdhesh Kumar v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Regunta Jagdhesh Kumar v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Afzal Vs The State of Telangana

Chinthakindi Ram Chander Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Chand Vs The State of Telangana

Ratnavath Kamalnath Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Lakkakula Chinna Narsaiah Vs State of Telangana

Begum Vs The State of Telangana