Disposed

Begum v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Apr 2024WP/31204/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This petition challenged the inaction of revenue authorities in updating land records and issuing an E-Passbook for petitioners. The High Court directed the District Collector to consider the application, provide notice to affected parties, and complete the exercise within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed 2nd Respondent to consider the online application dated 28.02.2024, put affected parties on notice, and complete the exercise within eight weeks.

Begum Vs The State of Telangana — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

WRIT PETITION No.31204 OF 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Begum, Wo Late Amee-n_uddin, aged about 54 years, Occ. Household, R/o Palepally Village, Doma Mandal, Vi-karabad District.

¶9

J_ahagr Pasha, S/o Late Ame_enuddin, aged about 37 years, Occ. Business, R/o Palepally Village, Doma Mandal, Vikaiabad District.

¶10

ti/ahboob Pasha, S/o L_ate Ameenuddin, aged about 31 years, Occ. Business, RJo Palepally Village, Doma lr/andal, Vikaabad District

¶11

...PETITIONERS

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State_ of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.'

¶14

The District Collector, Vikarabad District, Office at Vikarabad Town, Telangana State.

¶15

The Tahsildar, Doma Mandal, Office at Doma Town, Vikarabad District, Telangana State

¶16

...RESPONDENTS

¶17

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the H(7h Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the inaction of the Respondents No.2 and 3 in not uploading the land in Sy.No.1 17, admeasuring Ac 3-14 Gts, situated at Pallepally Village, Doma lvlandal, Vikarabad District in the Dharani portal in the name of the petitioners as illegal 85 arbitrary, and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 to upload the land in Sy.No.-l 17, admeasuring Ac 3-14

¶18

Gts, situated at Pallepally Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District in the Dharani Portal and issue E-Passbook to the petitioners-

¶19

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 and 3 to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 30/01/2023 to mutate the name of the petitioners in respect of land in Sy.No.117, admeasuring Ac 3-14 Gts, situated at Pallepally Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District in the Dharani Portal and issue E-Passbook to the petitioners, pending disposal of main Writ Petition.

¶21

Counsel forthe Petitioners: SRI A. NAJEEB KHAN

¶22

Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI SOMU SRINIVAS REDDY, AGP FOR REVENUE

¶23

The Court made the following: ORDER

: -: ' :Q.

a'.

,f E .ti f4tt

i iI ,J

{I $ ..:

{

.ri.

,$, t!t'

¶34

THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN IIIRIT PETITION No.312O4 of 2o23

¶35

¶36

{ORDER:

¶37

Heard Sri Sri A.Najeeb Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Somu Srinivas Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. perused the record. 2. According to petitioners, Sri Sharfuddin S/o Mub arak Ali was the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.3-06 gts in Sy.No.l17 situated at :'Pallepally Village, Doma Mandal, Vikarabad District. After the death of the said Sri Sharfuddin, the husband of l"t 'petitioner and father o1 2na petitioner i.e., Late Ameenuddin S/o Sharfuddin succeeded the said property. After the death of both Sri Sharfuddin and Sri Ameenuddin, the revenue + authorities have entered only 6 gts of land in Sy.No. 177 /AA2 / t, situated at Pallepally Village, Doma andal, iVikarabad District and issued Pass book to the I husband and father of petitioners respectively. Therefore,

: :

they have made online application^{dated 28'02'2024 with} ID.No.2400007310 to 2nd^{respondentwith a request to correct} the said wrong entry and issue^{E-PattadarPassbookin their n-,} favour. Despite receiving and^{acknowledgingthe said} application 2'd resporrdent did^{not act upon the same'} Therefore, the^present Writ^Petition.

¶42

trr It + '-I :l: *& lni s .) l+t 1 i: 11 I T 1

¶43

Learned Assistant Government^Pleaderfor

¶44

revenue, on instructions,^{would submit that 2"a respondent} wiII consider the said online^{application and pass appropriate} orders, in accordance^{with law}

¶45

1 :f ,t'S ir [# L..l i'.

¶46

In the light of the aforesaid^{discussion,this Writ61} li Petition is disposed off^{directing2"d respondent to consideril} the said online application^{dated 2A'O2'2024 with} ID.No.240OOO731O and^{pass appropriate orders strictly in} accordance with law by^{putting the petitioners and all other} effected parties on notice^{and affording them an opportunity'} If the 2"a respondent is^{not inclinedto acceptthe request} made by the petitioners,^{he shall assign reasonsand pass} appropriate orders. He shall communicate^{the said order to}

¶47

i ., 1 .'t,r^. .-l '': ,li,i ,td ,'l tq #,:$ .r; .t'I i8r^r:t -ifi 1* '^'1 ,i II

'-:E..j.:''

t
{

the petitioners herein and he shall complete the entire exercise within a period of eight (g) weeks from the date of f."ceipt of copy of this order There shall be no order as to ,ft.sts. #' .

¶52

. As a sequel, thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ petition shall stand closed.

¶53

SD/-MOHD. ts AIL //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGI RAR To, SECTION FFICER ' #E"ffgtlrcollector,^{Vikarabad Disrrict,ofrice} ar vikarabad rown, 2. One CC to Mr. A. NAJEEB KHAN, Advocate [OpUC] t ly&r:8i.ibGP for Revenue, Hish court for the stare of retansana ar

¶54

Two CD Copies

¶55

¶56

GJP g

tl
E
#t

I I
I

HIGH COURT

DATED:0210412024

;-r i iir: s i4 /c-
c
C) a
(,
/-).)
|) 0 4 JUt zul vZ
t)
.l ,,:-,a,-, rt {

¶62

ORDER

¶63

WP.No.31204 of 2023

¶64

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION

¶65

WTTHOUT COSTS

¶66

Begum v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Begum v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Afzal Vs The State of Telangana

Chinthakindi Ram Chander Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Chand Vs The State of Telangana

Ratnavath Kamalnath Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Lakkakula Chinna Narsaiah Vs State of Telangana

Regunta Jagdhesh Kumar Vs State of Telangana