Dismissed

M/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd v. The State of Telengana

Telangana HC13 Nov 2024WP/7671/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed Writ Petition No. 7671 of 2019 as not pressed by the petitioner. The court accepted this dismissal as settlement had been reached outside the court during the pendency of the writ petition, concluding which all connected miscellaneous applications were closed.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed; miscellaneous applications were closed.

M/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd Vs The… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[3296 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA^{AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF^NOVEN4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

RESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR^REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 7671 OF 2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

lVl/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund P\i't. Ltd, Rep^by its^{Foremen/Legal[t/a-nager,} Sri.Pesara.Nirsi Reddy S/o late Anji^{Reddy,Aged about 34Years, officeat} Flat No.203, T.N.Rs Vaishnavi Complex,^{H.No.11-4-649/2 and 3'} Lakadikapool, Hyderabad

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of Telengana, Rep by^{Principal Secretary,Revenue} Department(Region-l ),Secretariat buildings,^Hyderabad.

¶12

2 The Dy. Registrar of Chits/Arbitrator, Hyderabad^{(South), Erragadda,} Hyderabad.

¶13

3 tr//s Sri Sai Balaji Services, Associates rep^fr,4anaglng ?g(ql, DF.V.Hemalatha Ageri about 38 Years.^{Flat No.401} ,^{H.No.B-7-1711421143'} Plot No.138to 145 in Sy.No.49, Swarnnadama^{Nagar,OldBowenpally,} Secundrabad

¶14

4 D.V.N.Santosh Kumar, S/o D.V.Venu Gopal^{tVurthyAged about 4'l Years,} Occ. Senior Accountant, Office of The^{Principal Govt of AP,EIVP} No.201 1162, Welfare Section, C Block,lst Flaor, Saifabad,^Hyderabad.

¶15

5 IVlrs.Latha Santosh, W/o D.V.N.Santosh Kumar Aged^{about 40 Years,Occ.} Senior Clerk, Electrical Dept,4th Floor,^Staff of^{CEESoffice of the South} Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secundrabad.

¶16

It/rs.K.Santosh Lakshmi, Wo K.Praveen,^{FIat No.61,Vijaya Residency,Ir/ES} Colony, West Venkatapuram, Near Vasishnodevi^{temple, Secuderabad.}

¶17

Mr.D.V.S.Srinivas, S/o Yagna Narayana^{SharmaFlat No.502,Block N.o.1,} Swathi Heights, sth Floor,Dl.A.S.Rao Nagar,Hyderabad

¶18

...RESPONDENTS

¶19

Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution^{of India prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to issue Writ, or Writs, Order or Orders more^{particularlyin} the^natureof mandamus thereby challenging the orders^{passed by the 1st Respondentvide}

¶20

memo.No.2466/Regn.l/A1/2015 dt.15.03.2019^preferred by the Respondent^No.3 to 8, as illegal, arbitrary and against the^principles of natural^justice and consequently set a side the orders^passed by the 1st Respondent^vide memo.No.2466/Regn.l/A1 /201 5 dt. 1 5.03.20'1 9.

¶21

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court may be^pleased to suspend the orders passed by the 1st Respondent vide memo.No.2466 /Regn.l/Al /201 5 dt.¹ 5.03.201 9.

¶23

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶24

Between:

¶25

'1 . Mis Sri Sai Balaji Services, Associates . rep Managing Partenr DF.V.Hemalatha Aged about 38 Years. Flat No.40'1 , H.No.B'7-1711421143, Plot No.138to 145 in Sy.No.49, Swarnnadama Nagar,. Old Bowenpally, Secundrabad

¶26

D.V.N.Santosh Kumar, S/o D.V.Venu Gopal Murthy Aged about 4l Years, Occ. Senior Accountant, Office of The Principal Govt of AP, EIUP No.201 1 1 62. Welfare Section, C Block,l st Floor, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶27

Mrs.Latha Santosh, W/o D.V.N.Santosh Kumar Aged about 40 Years, Occ. Senior Clerk, Electrical Dept,4th Floor, Staff of CEES office of the South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secundrabad.

¶28

[Vlrs.K.Santosh Lakshmi, Wo K.Praveen, Flat No.61 , Vijaya Residency, tvlES Colony, West Venkatapuram, Near Vasishnodevi temple, Secuderabad.

¶29

Mr.D.V.S.Srinivas, S/o Yagna Narayana Sharma Flat No.502, Block No.'1, Swathi Heights, 5th Floor,Dr.A.S.Rao Nagar,Hyderabad

¶30

...PETITIONER

¶31

AND

¶32

1 The State of Telengana, Rep by Principal Secretary, Revenue Department(Region-l ),Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad.

¶33

2 The Dy. Registrar of Chits/Arbitrator, Hyderabad (South), Erragadda, Hyderabad.

¶34

3 M/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd, Rep by its Foremen/Legal Manager, Sri.Pesara.Narsi Reddy S/o late Anji Reddy, Aged about 34Years, office at Flat No.203, T.N.Rs Vaishnavi Complex, H.No.11-4-649/2 and 3, Lakadikapool, Hyderabad

¶35

..,RESPONDENTS

¶36

Petition under Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the^{petition,the High Court may be pleasedto} vacate the order dt. 12-04-2019 in W.P.^{No. 7671 of 2019.}

¶37

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.S.R.M.V.PRASAD^SANAKA

¶38

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 &^{2: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶39

Counsel for the Respondent No.3 to^{7: SRIDr. P.B.VIJAYA KUMAR}

¶40

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶41

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{C.V.BHASKAR REDDY}

¶42

WRIT PETITION No.7671 of 2OL9

¶43

ORDER:

¶44

The learned counsel for the^petitioner has fairly^submitted that during the pendency of the^present writ^{petition, the parties} have settled the matter outside of the Court and^{therefore, the} petitioner is not pressing this writ petition.

¶45

ln view of the above submission, this Writ Petition^is dismissed as not- pressed.

¶46

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

¶47

closed. No order as to costs.

¶48

SD/. T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// \

¶49

SECiIoN OFFICER

¶50

To,

¶51

One CC to SRI V.S.R.IM.V.PRASAD SANAKA,^Advocate IOPUCI

¶52

One CC to SRI DT.P.B.VIJAYA KUMAR, Advocate IOPUCI

¶53

Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the^{State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶54

Two CD Copies

BSR GJP

l,t

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1311112024

ORDER

WP.No.7671 of 2019

1 fi tr 14
)
6.
? oI JAr'r zozl
,l
-a
,14TC H €-o

¶62

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION

AS NOT PRESSED,

.i-

WITHOUT COSTS

ult, lry

M/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd v. The State of Telengana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd v. The State of Telengana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Sssipl, Sslcc, Rmmc Vs The State of Telangana

Manthri Radha Vs The State of Telangana and 5others

Miryala Prathap Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Kallem Niranjan Reddy Vs State of Telangana

Nagula Anand Vs The State of Telangana

Sri Sayeedath Unnisa Begum Vs The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration Government of Telangana