Dismissed

Kallem Niranjan Reddy v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC13 Nov 2024WP/5048/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed the present order as a mere notice regarding a withdrawn writ petition. The underlying petition was withdrawn by the petitioners after the Government repealed the 1971 Act and enacted the 2020 Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act. The court accorded permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek remedies under the new Act.

What did the court decide?

The present miscellaneous application notice is dismissed without costs.

Kallem Niranjan Reddy Vs State of Telangana — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32e6 ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF NOVEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 5048 0F 2019

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Kallem Niranjan Reddy, S/o.K.Sudarshan Reddy, aged about 44 vears.

¶9

Occ:Agi-iculture, Fl/o.H.No.1-.120. Ba!apur. Sai'cornaqar t"4andal. Ranga Reddy District.

¶10

1. Kallem Shivarajan Reddy, Sio.K.Sanieeva Reddy, aged about 42 vears. Occ. Agricutture,^p/o.H.No.9_t t 0, Bilapur Village, Saroornagar lVandal. Ranga Reddy District.

¶11

3 Kallem Madan l,4ohan Reddy,.Qlo [a!.!em Om Reddy, aged about 42 years, Occ Agricutture. Rl/o H.No.9-125t1. Batapi,r Vilr#' S;rooilg;,. Id;;;t: Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

4 Kallem Dheeraj Kumar Reddy. S/o.K.prakash Reddy, aged about 41 years. occ.Agncutture, R/o H.No. r -i a+. e"r,p,ii- vtlt'u;;'' d;r*r;;;;;' idil;]l Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

5 Kallem. Manoj Randheer Reddy, S/o.K.prakash Reddy, aged about 40 vears, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No. i i1 20, Balapur Village,'' SJ;r;"""n:;-M;ffi;], Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

...PETITIONERS

¶15

AND

¶16

1 P9]" :f^{Telangana, rep. by its principal Secretary Revenue} Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶17

2 The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division, Ranga Reddy District

¶18

4 The Tahsildar, Balapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶19

...RESPONDENTS

¶20

Petition under Articre 226 of the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the endorsemenr no.8t101r2019 dated..r 7.0.r.20.r 9 issued by the 4th respondent rejecting the case of the petitioners for issuance of

¶21

e-passbooks in respect of land admeasuring Ac.27-30 gts.under sy.no.B8 of Balapur Village, Saroornagar Mandar, Ranga Reddy District, is ilregal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional, and in violation of principles of natural justice, and also contrary to the Telangana Rights in Land and pattadar passbooks Act, 1g71 , and the rules made thereunder, and set aside the same, and consequently direct the respondents to issue e-passbooks in the names of the petitioners in respect of subject lands.

¶22

lA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶23

Petition under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respon,ients to issue e-passbooks in the names of the petitioners in respect of land admeasuring Ac.27-30 gts., under sy.no.gg of Balapur Village, saroornagar [,4andal. Ranga Reddy District, by suspending the endorsement no. 8110112019 dated.17.01 .2019 issued by the 4th respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶24

lA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶25

Between:

¶26

'1. State of Telangana, rep. by its principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶27

The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District.

¶28

The Revenue Divisronar officer, Kandukur Division, Ranga Reddy District.

¶29

The Tahsildar, Batapur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶30

. . . PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS

¶31

AND

¶32

1 Kallem Niranjan Reddy, S/o.K.Sudarshan Reddy, aged about 44 years, Occ:Agnculture R/o.H.No.1-120, Balapur Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

¶33

2 Kallem Shivaraian Reddy, S/o. K. Sanjeeva Reddy, aged about 42 years, Occ: Agriculture, P/o.H.N o.9-'l 10, Balapur Village, Saroornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶34

3 Kallem Madan Mohan Reddy, S/o.Kallem Om Reddy, aged about 42 yearc, Occ: AgricuJture. R/o.H.No.O-125t1. Batapur vitiagt, Siiooinigir Mlni"i, Ranga Reddy District.

¶35

4 Kallem Dheeraj Kumar Reddy, S/o.K.Prakash Reddv. aoed about 41 vears. Occ.Agriculture, R/o.H.No.1-184, Balapur Village,- S5roornagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶36

5 Kallem Manoj Randheer Reddy, S/o.K.Prakash Reddy, aoed about 40 vears. Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o.H.No.1-'120. Balapur Village.' SJroornagar Mindal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶37

...RESPONDENTS

¶38

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt 12.03.2019 passed in lA.No.^.1 of 201g in WP.No.5048 of 2019 and dismiss the writ petition.

¶39

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt MOHD MOIN AHMED eUADRt

¶40

Counsel forthe Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE

¶41

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶42

¶43

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY}

¶44

WRIT PETITION No.5O48 of²⁰¹⁹

¶45

ORDER:

¶46

When this matter^{is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for} the petitioners^{has submittedthat pending adjudicationof the} present writ^{petition, the Governmenthas repealed the Telangana} Rights in^{Land and PattadarPass BooksAct, l97l (for short the} ROR Act,¹⁹⁷¹ ')^{and enacted neu' Act called as "theTelangana} Rights in Land^{and PattadarPass BooksAct,2O2O"(for short'ROR} Act, 2O2O1 and^{therefore, sought permissionof this Courtto} withdraw the Writ^{Petition with a libertyto the petitioners to avail} the remedy^{of filing an appropriate applicationas per the provisions} of the ROR^{Act, 2O2O for issuance of e-passbooksin respect of the} subject lands.

¶47

Permission as sought lbr is accorded

¶48

Granting liberty as^{prayed for,} this Writ^{Petitionis dismissed} as withdrawn

¶49

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, shail

¶50

stand closed.^No costs

¶51

SD/L. VIJAYA^LAXMI ASSIST T REGISTRAR

¶52

,TRUE^COPY//

¶53

SECTION^OFFICER

¶54

to'',. on" CC to Sri Mohd tr'4oin Ahmed Quadri'' Ad'vocate IOPUCI 2 Two ccs to GP t"t^{a'J""""'l'"iiigi'Court ?or tne State of Telangana'at} - HYderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD^CoPies

TJ GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 311112024

ORDER

WP.No.5048 of 2019

S T t:
O7q
7-
0
oo 1 B tt U ?[21 i.
A.
I
r) S I Lt

¶61

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶62

P
4t
J/ /, ,/t/

Kallem Niranjan Reddy v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kallem Niranjan Reddy v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Sssipl, Sslcc, Rmmc Vs The State of Telangana

Manthri Radha Vs The State of Telangana and 5others

Miryala Prathap Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Nagula Anand Vs The State of Telangana

M/s Sreenilaya Chit Fund Pvt.Ltd Vs The State of Telengana

Sri Sayeedath Unnisa Begum Vs The Chief Commissioner of Land Administration Government of Telangana