Disposed

K.Anjaneyulu v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC11 Jan 2024WP/726/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In WP No. 726 of 2024 and IA No. 1 of 2024, the High Court of Telangana disposed of a writ petition challenging the non-allotment of house plots by directing respondents to consider subsequent representations without deciding merits.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to consider petitioners' representations dated 08/09/2023 and 21/12/2023 and pass appropriate orders within eight weeks.

K.Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

\ \

¶2

[³³⁰² ]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE^{K. SARATH}

¶7

WRIT PETI TION NO: 726 OF²⁰²⁴

¶8

Between:

¶9

'1 . K.Anianevulu, S/o K.Nalla Reddy, aged aboul 42 years All are Rl/o Revulapalli villag'e, Dharoor Mandal, Jogulamba^{Gadwal District}

¶10

C.Muneppa, S/o Chinna^{Hanumanthu, agedabout 53 years,}

¶11

G.Raju, S/o Ayyanna, aged^{about 39 years,}

¶12

G.Sreenu, S/o Bheemanna,^{aged about 35 years,}

¶13

K.Govindu, S/o Katika^{Bheemanna' aged about 39 years'}

¶14

Kurva Venkataiah, S/o^{Ayyanna, aged about 36 years'}

¶15

C.Lakshmaiah, S/o^{Chinna Hanumanthu, aged about 43 years,}

¶16

B. B.Bheemaiah, S/o Narsamia,^{aged about 36 years,}

¶17

Hanumanthu, S/o G.Nalla^{Reddy, aged about 33 years,}

¶18

D.Ravi, S/o Hanumanthu,^{aged about 31 years,}

¶19

All are Rl/o Revulapalli^{village, Dharoor Mandal, Jogulamba Gadwal District}

¶20

...PETITIONERS

¶21

AND

¶22

The State of Telangana,^{rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department,} Secretariat Buildings,^HYderabad

¶23

The District Collector,^{Jogulamba Gadwal District at Gadwal,}

¶24

The Tahsildar, Dharoor^{Mandal, Dharoor, Jogulamba Gadwal District}

¶25

...RESPONDENTS

¶26

Petition under Article^{226 of the constitutionof lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High court maybe} pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus^{or any other appropriate writ or direction} declaring the action of^{the respondents in not allotting the houseplots of size 60} x4o (266 Sq.yards), as^{allotted to the displaced familiesof Revulapallivillage, as} illegal, arbitiary and discriminatory^{and Consequentlydirect the respondents2} ,nd'3 to allot hbuse^{plots of size 6O'X40'(266 Sq.yards) to the petitioners'}

¶27

IA NO|¹ 0F²⁰²⁴

¶28

Petition under Section^{151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated} in the affidavit^{titeo in support of tne puiition, If'e Hign Courtmay.b^e,p.le^ased to} directtherespondents2and3toconsidertherepresentationdatedSl9l2023and 2lll2t2o23submittedbythepetitionersforallotmentofhouseplotadmeasuring 266 Sq.^{yards each to inl'p"iitioners, pending disposalof the above Writ} petition.

¶29

Counset for the^{Petitioner:SRI P. GANGA RAMI REDDY}

¶30

Counsel for the Respondents:^{GP FORLAND ACQUISITION}

¶31

The Court made^{the following: ORDER}

¶32

, I

¶33

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.726 OF 2o.24

¶34

ORDER:

¶35

Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. With the consent of both sides, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself

¶36

Learned Governmen[ Pleader for the respondent No.2 submits that the respondent No.2 will consider on the representations filed by the petitioners O8.O9.2O23 and 21.12.2023 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

¶37

In view of the submissions made by the both sides, without going into the merits of the case, the present writ petition 1S disposed of directing the respondents to consider the representations filed by the petitioners on O8.O9.2O23 and 21.12.2023 and

¶38

¶39

pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within eight (8) weeks from the date of receipt^{of a}

¶40

copy of this order. No order as to costs.

¶41

Miscellaneous petitions, if any,^pending shall

¶42

stand closed.

¶43

SD/. C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶44

//TRUE COPY//

¶45

SECTI N OFFICER

¶46

To, '1 . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, The State of Telangana, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad

¶47

The District Collector, Jogulamba Gadwal District at Gadwal,

¶48

The Tahsildar, Dharoor Mandal, Dharoor, Jogulamba Gadwal^District

¶49

One CC to SRI P. GANGA RAMI REDDY, Advocate TOPUCI

¶50

Two CCs to GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION, High Court^{for the State of} Telangana. [OUT]

¶51

Two CD Copies BN

GJP

(

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 110112024

€ 5TArE
1
ooJ I E tLts 2slt c)

OESPN

¶59

ORDER

¶60

WP.No.726 of 2024

¶61

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶62

6Pd" w fi't*

K.Anjaneyulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Anjaneyulu v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pedda Mallaiah, Vs State of Telangana

The Revenue Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Sri Nava Bharathi-Ii Mahila Sangham Vs The State of Telangana

N. Muni Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

kanthula Komuraiah Vs The Government of Ap

Pandula Anjaiah Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal