Writ petition challenging a government order on village declaration under the A.P. Gram Panchayats Rules, pending since 2013; no representation appeared for petitioners and it was dismissed for non-prosecution/default with no costs.
None granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution/default, no costs, miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAYOFJANUARY,- TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 13519 OF 2013
Between:
All are R/o Kistampally village, Nandimalla Post, Via Atmakur,Narva Mandal, Mahabubnagar District
...PETITIONERS
AND
,..RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe Constitutionof India prayingthat in the circumstanoes stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularly onein the nature of writ of Mandantus declaringthe G.O.Ms.No.14,dt-18.O1.2013issuedby the 1"t respondent as being illegal,arbitrary and violationof principles of natural justice /' and further violative of Rule-12of A.P. Gram Panchayats (Declaration of Villages) Rules, 200i'and consequentlyset-aside the same.
Counsel for the Petitioners:M/S. S A K MYNUDDIN
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.1to 4: GP FORPANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.sand 6: SRI P. RAGHAVENDER REDDY' SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
Counsel for the Respondent No.7:SRIG. PURUSHOTAMREDDY,
The Court tnade the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PEf,ITTON No.13519of 2O13
ORDER:
This petition iscoming for hearing since 2013' On 14.L2.2O23,when the matter was called, there was no representationon behalf of the petitioners,and therefore the matter wasdirected to be listed today under the caption "for Dismissa-I".Even today, when the matter is called, there isnorepresentationonbehalf ofthe petitioners. It seemsthat the petitionersare not interested to prosecute thiscase.
petition, shall standclosed.
SD/. G. S]REESHA ASSISTANT REGlSTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SEC OFFICER
To,
TJ GJP1l+r
HIGH COIJRT l {llil DATED:1'll0112 024I il, { l'! I{lr l l F x I
I
II
ORDER
i
I
WP.No.131519 of ZO13
7
J
it i+
1 -b
at
*
t
OE SPAlC
i
ifiiTir
,I il
fi
t,
i
ti
li
DISMISSINIG THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAU LT
WITHOUT COSTS.
1\ ,-V<br>A-i2r
3 provisions across 3 enactments
N. Muni Reddy
B. Venkatanna
D. Anjaneyulu
N. Venkata Reddy
B. Raju
The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development (Pts.IV) Dept.
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
