Writ petition seeking to stop alleged unauthorised construction on the petitioner's land was pending since 2013. With no petitioner representation on two consecutive hearing dates, the court dismissed it for non-prosecution/default, closed pending miscellaneous applications, and made no order on costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 33489 OF 2013
Between:
Pandula Anjaiah, S/o. Shivaiah, 52 years, Agriculturist, R/o.'l -84, Kothularam Village, Munugode Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents inmaking constructions in the petitioners land at 1-84 Kothularam Village, MunugodeMandal of Nalgonda District as illegal, arbitrary, withoutjurisdiction, unlust, null and void and consequently direct the respondents not to makeany constructionsin the petitioners land without following due process of law.
.,' l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO:4 1668 0F 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to make any constructions in the open space admeasuring 16 sq. yds. al 1-84 Kothularam Village, Munugode lvlandal, Nalgonda District, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BATHINI PAPA RAO GOUD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4: SRt P.RAGHAVENDOR REDDY, SC FOR TG-MPPS GPPS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.s & 6: GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.7 & 8: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRT JUSTICEK.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.33489 of2O13
ORDER:
This petition is comingfor hearing since 2013. On 14.12.2023, when thematter was ca-lled, there was no representation on behalf ofthe petitioner,and therefore the matter was directed to belisted today under the caption "for Dismissal". Eventoday, when the matter is called, there is no representationonbehalf ofthe petitioner. It seems that thepetitioner is not interestedto prosecute this case.
SD/-B. SARASWATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
PSK.
GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110112024
ORDER
WP.No.33489 of 2013
1EL,1,, i.:.,
A.v
t\
C. t-4,"
w l!ic
F tT (,
C) N
)
!/:
') t)4,
DISMISSING THE WRITPETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAULTWITHOUT COSTS.
@ oq'r w
6w
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pandula Anjaiah
Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department
District Panchayat Officer, Nalgonda
Mandal Development Officer, Munugode
Kothularam Gram Panchayat, rep. by Sarpanch
Superintendent of Police, Nalgonda
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
