Dismissed

The Revenue Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Telangana HC10 Jan 2024WP/16973/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition seeking permission to acquire land from a temple for an industrial park, after the petitioner withdrew the petition via an application in the registry.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

The Revenue Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁰² ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 16973 OF 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

The Revenue Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer, Nalgonda Division, Nalgonda District ...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

'1 . The State of Telangana Rep.by its Secretary, Revenue (Endowments) Department, Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.

¶11

The Commissioner, Endowments Department, Tilak Road, Bogulakunta, Hyderabad

¶12

The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.

¶13

4- The Executive Officer, Sitharamchandra Swamy Temple, Anneparthy Village, Nalgonda [V1andal, Nalgonda District

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, according permission to the petitioner to acquire the proposed land to an extent ol Ac.27.38 gts in Sy.Nos. 187, 188, 189,^'190, 197, 198, 199 recorded on the name of Seetharamachand raswamy temple situated at Anneparthy Village, Nalgonda [t/andal, Nalgonda District, as it is required for a public purpose i.e., for establishment of lndustrial Park at Anneparthy (V) of Nalgonda (M) and district,

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

¶17

Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petilion, the High court may be pleased to accord Permission to the Petitioner to acquire the proposed land to an extent of 4c.27.38 gts in Sy.Nos. 187,188,189, 190, 197,198,199 record on the name of seetharamachandraswamy temple situated at Anneparthy Village, Nalgonda lMandal, Nalgonda District, as it is required for a public purpose., for establishment of lndustrial Park at Anneparthy (V) of Nalgonda (M) and District, pending disposal of the Writ Petition

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI TERA RAJTNIKANTH REDDY, ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1to3: Gp FOR ENDOWMENTS

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.4: SRI KOTHA JAGAN MOHAN RAO, SC The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

I I

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

¶23

WRIT PETITION No. 16973 of 2 o22

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Sri Tera Rajinikanth Reddy, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the petitioner filed a letter dated O8.O1.2024 in the Registry, seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition.

¶26

Accordingly, permission is granted as sought for. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there

¶27

sha-ll be no order as to costs.

¶28

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

¶29

SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

Two CCs to ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL ,High Court for the State

¶34

^{of Telangana,atHyderabad[OUT]}

¶35

1. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWN/ENTS ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

¶36

1. One CC to SRI KOTHA JAGAN TVOHAN RAO, STANDTNG coUNSELIOPUCI

¶37

Two CD Copies BIU

GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:1010112024

ORDER

'1.
la .<br>A) .$"
x,
Ur
\e
tro
,.O
J HcrH *

¶43

WP.No.16973 of 2022

¶44

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS

¶45

$e1iu,
6vv-

¶46

The Revenue Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Revenue Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer v. The State of Telangana and 3 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sama Raji Reddy, Vs The District Panchayath Officer

M. Krishnamachary Vs The Tahsildar

Konakati Shankar Reddy Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh

Pedda Mallaiah, Vs State of Telangana

Sri Nava Bharathi-Ii Mahila Sangham Vs The State of Telangana

Bonagiri Chandra Reddy Vs The District Collector