Petitioners challenged an order demanding a bank guarantee as arbitrary. The Court held the cause no longer survives as the connected criminal appeal disposing the impugned order was already decided.
Writ petition closed without order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:39542 OF 2015
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the orders of the 2nd respondent in MC No. 32212015 dated 2B-1 1-2015 in demanding bank guarantee of Rs. 4,77,6001-towards vehicle and Rs. 30,000/- towards the rice is arbitrary, and without any power or authority under law
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2015(WPMP. NO: 51001 OF 20i5)
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents to release the Vehicle Lorry Bearing No.TS 04'1 1/1 6393 and rice 15-00 Qtls on furnishing bank guarantee of 50% demanded by the Respondent pursuant to the orders of the 2nd respondent in MC No. 32212015 daled 2B-11-2015 pending disposal of Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. H. V. R. R. SWAMY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR elVlL SUPPLIES The Court made the following: ORDER
.7
SK, .] W. P. No.39;.12 of 20 I5
II
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No.3954 2 of 2Ol5
ORDER:
This u,rit petition is filed seeking to decle.re the order passed by the respondent No.2 in M.C.No.322 of 2015 dated 28.11.2015 in demanding Bank guarantee of Rs.4,77,600l- towards vehicle and Rs.3O,OO0/_ towards rice as illegal and arbitrary.
2
SK..I W.P. No.39542 of 2015
Government Pleader for Civil Supplies, the Writ Petition is
closed. No order as to costs.
writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTAN REG TRAR //TRUE COPY//
S ION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRl. H. V. R. R. SWAMY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES ,High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies BM GJP
c&
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0 4109t2024
,- \
j 0 rii .,ll i ji
)t!
t, /l
.t //
i- //
./J ,,. /
ORDER
WP.No.39542 ot 2015
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS
2 issues framed by the court
Review whether the order demanding bank guarantee was legal and arbitrary.
Whether the writ petition still requires disposal in light of the pendency and disposal of the connected criminal appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shaik Peer Mohammad
Banavath Balakoti
The State of Telangana
The Joint Collector, Khammam District
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
