Writ petition challenging a Gram Panchayat demolition notice was dismissed after counsel reported no instructions from petitioners, who were unserved and apparently uninterested in prosecuting the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[33021
HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY. THE FOURTHDAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO IHOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 29316 OF 2016
Between:
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitutionof India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ. Order orDirection, more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus, to declare the impugned Noticedt.16.08.2016 issued by the 3'd respondentfor demolitionof the Cellar portionin premises bearing D.No.3-1 86, PlotNo.781, Pragathinagar, Qutbullapur Mandal, R.R.District, without any authority as beingillegal, arbitrary and unconstitutionaland consequently set aside thesame.
l.A. NO:2 OF 2016(WPMP. NQ: 36298 OF 2016)
Petition under section 151 CPCpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High courtmay be pleasedto grant stay of all furtherproceedings includingdemolition of the Suit portion in premises bearing D.No.3-1 86, Plotno.781, Pragathinagar, QutbullapurMandal, R.R.District'
pursuant to the notice dt. 16.08.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent herein, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and to pass
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016{WVMP. NO: 4183 OF 2016)
Between:
Pragathi Nagar Gram Panchayat, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary Qutbullapupr Mandal, R. R.District.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.3
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section'151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dismiss the above writ petition by vacating the interim order passed in WPMPNo.36298 of 2016 in WPNo.29316 of 2016 dated 31.08.2016
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI M.VIJAYA KUMAR GOUD Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL
counset for the Respondent No.3: sRt c.NAREIYDER REDDv, sc FoRTG zppMPP.GPPS
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.29316 ot 2OL6
ORDDR:
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that he has no instructions from the petitioners to proceed further in the matter. In view of the sarne, he has sent letters to them and the sarne were returned as ,unserved,. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute the case and requested to pass appropriate orders.
petition shall stand closed.
SD/.N. S HARI ASSISTANT REGI TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To
\
4
PSK. Two CD Copies AP GJP
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0 410912024
ORDER
WP.No.29316 of 201G
{{,rE s
\ r), 1<br>J
oL 0 / .uy upt
{+
ir++g
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION/ DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS.
P/-, -{rF"l"Y 7c4ix)
Ganesh Chowdary
Smt. Leela Devi
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Department
The District Panchayat Officer, Ranga Reddy District
Pragathi Nagar Gram Panchayat, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Qutbullapur Mandal, R.R. District
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
