A gram panchayat sought a mandamus directing authorities to allot land transactions and cess amounts to it after bifurcation from another panchayat. Counsel for the petitioner stated the cause did not survive and the petition had become infructuous; the High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I f I i I i I t i i I j
I
[33021
\
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO IHOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 39263 0F 20't4
Between:
Ramapuram Gram Panchayat, rep. by its Sarpanch Chinthamalla Saidulu, S/o: Late. Ramaswamy ag_irO St yeais, Ramdpuram village NereOuCnerid Mandal, Nalgonda District, T.S.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the inaction of the respondent authorities in allotting the lands along with its transactions and cess amounts pertaining to the lands fallen within the jurisdiction of the Ramapuram Gram Panchayat despite the letter of the 5th respondent bearing Lr.No.B/6368/2014 dt.26-11-2014 as per the List appended to it, and though the petitioner gram panchayat was bifurcated from the 6rh respondent gram panchayat way back in the year 1983, as being illegal, arbitrary and unjust and to grant.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 49254OF 20141
Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent no.4 herein to implement the orders of the Sth respondent vide Lr.No.B/636812O14 dt.26.11.2014, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PALLE NAGESWAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2,4 and 5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: SRI P. RAGHAVENDER REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.39263of 2Ot4
ORDER:
Today when the matteris taken up for hearing the learned Counsel forpetitionersubmits that the cause in the present Writ Petitiondoes not survive and thereby
the Writ Petition hasbecome infructuous.
Petition is dismissedas infructuous.
any' shall stand closed.No order as to costs.
SD/- T. JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGIS
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SriPalle Nageswar Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
a.i*sE:irtrBlg:fl:f; :i:ln:ig'.:,:''3:}:1i;'fiJlll[,of,Y31,n,o,,n" - State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
+. i','il-ctd iJCl;toi nev6nue, Higti cou-rt tor the State of Telangana' at Hyderabad [OUTI
TJ GJP
6
j
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210112024
ORDER
WP.No.39263 ot 2014
e 1HE SI4 14:
o
U
')-
0 7 ni,R 2024 i
* * ,\l
'sPATcH EO
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUT COSTS.
e)*' W
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survived in view of the petitioner's submission that the cause no longer survives.
Ramapuram Gram Panchayat, rep. by its Sarpanch Chinthamalla Saidulu
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department
The District Collector, Nalgonda District
The District Panchayat Officer, Nalgonda District
The Sub-Registrar, Huzurnagar Town and Mandal, Nalgonda District
The Tahsildar, Nereducherla Mandal, Nalgonda District
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
