The Telangana High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 12102 of 2014 and closed pending miscellaneous applications for non-prosecution default, as the petitioners did not appear or file representation on the scheduled hearing dates.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution/default; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 12102 OF 2014
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action on the respondents 4 and 5 in laying the road in between thepetitioners land situated in Sy No. 356/AA and 356/E of an extent of Ac.4.00gts of Choudur Village and Madnal, Mahaboobnagar District within the boundaries of East: Road, West: Land of Kollur village, North: land of Ramaiah and South: land of Somla and his son, by not considering the representations of thepetitioners daled 10.02.2014 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16,21 and 300-4 of the
Constitution of lndia and consequently direct therespondents toconsider the representations dt.10.02.2014 of thepetitioners.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(W PMP. NO: 15232OF 20141
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court maybe pleased to direct the respondents 4 and 5 not to lay the road from thepetitioners land bearingNo. Sy No. 356/4A and 356/E of an extent of Ac.4.00gts of ChoudurVillageand Madnal, Mahaboobnagar District within the boundaries ofEast: Road,West: Land of Kollur village, North: land of Ramaiah and South: land of Somia and his son, by considering the representations of thepetitioners dated1O.O2.2O14, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: M/S N. NAGAVANI PRASUNA
Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 and 3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ &RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondent No.4 and 5: SRI RAGHAVENORA REDDY, SC
Counsel forthe Respondent No.6: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
,/.'
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.121O2 of 201-4
ORDER
This petition is coming for hearing since 2014. On L6.12.2O23 when the matter was callled, there was no representation, and therefore the matter was directed to be
listed today under the caption "for Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute this case.
stand closed.
SD/. N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT EGI TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1210112024
ORDER
WP.No.12102 o12014
f\C .'i 14 14-
(.
e
oJ
1 6 FtB 202{
.l
* *
O6 spficH rg
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAULT
WITHOUT COSTS.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of representation by the petitioners.
Whether pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Boddam Bikshapathi
Sri Chengali Krishna
The Government of A.P.
The District Collector, Mahaboobnagar District
The District Panchayat Officer, Mahaboobangar District
The Panchayat Secretary, Nawabpet Village and mandal Mahaboobnagar District
SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
