A decade-old writ petition complaining of illegal construction on agricultural land was repeatedly listed with no representation from the petitioner; the court dismissed it for non-prosecution/default without costs and closed pending miscellaneous applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 34950 oF 2013
Between:
Thatipamula Narsimha Chary S/o. Sathaiah, aged about 65 years, occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Kondagadapa village, Mothkur tvlandal, Nalgonda histrict
...PET|TIONER AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or a Writ one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the in-action of the respondents on the complaint dated 04- t 1-2013 of the petitioner against the illegal construction of the un-official respondent constructing a house building by occupying the agriculture land of the petitioner is illegal contrary to law and bias under the Principles of Natural Justice consequently direct the respondents to remove the illegal construction already made by the un-official respondent.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 43434 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents to stop the illegal construction of the un-official respondent constructing a house building by occupying the agriculture land of the petitioner, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
l.A. NO: I OF 2013(VWMP. NO:4087 OF 2013)
Between:
Murarisetti Yadagiri Swamy S/o Veeraiah, Deputy Sarpanch, Rl/o Kondagada village, Ivlothkur mandal, Nalgonda district
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.6
AND
...RES'.NDENTS/RES'.NDENTS
...RESPONDENTMRIT PET]TIONER
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders Dtd.09/1212O13 granted in WPMP No. 4343412O13 in WP.No. 3455012013.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MADHUSUDHAN REDDY BHUREDDY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'|, 4 & 7: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2,3 & 5: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL
DEV
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: TODUPUNURI KARTIKEYA GOUD
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITIONNo'34950of 2O13
ORDER:
This petitionis coming for hearing since 20 13' On 2a.O7.2022and 19. l2'2O23 when the matter was called' there wasno representation, and thereforethe matter was directedtobelistedtodayunderthecaption"for Dismissal".Even today, when the matter is ca-lled' there is no representation.Itseems that the Petitioner is not interestedto prosecutethis case'
prosecution/default.No order as to costs'
stand closed.
SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSTSTAN\RS!SrRAR //TRUE COPY//
h/
SECTION OFFICER
To
PSK. GJP
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910112024
ORDER
WP.No.34950 of 2013
-( l-? S TA re
(
Jo,J 02 ttB 2[24 i)
r:.
* 0
D E iL o C
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION/ DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS.
to
0rrtt* I
(lt(-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking removal of an alleged illegal construction on petitioner's agricultural land should be dismissed for non-prosecution.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Thatipamula Narsimha Chary
The District Collector, Nalgonda District
The District Panchayathraj Officer, Nalgonda District
The Divisional Panchayathraj Officer, Bhongir Division
The Tahsildar, Mothkur Mandal
The Village Revenue Officer, Kondagadapa village
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
