Writ petition challenging a Gram Panchayat publication calling for CSP applications was dismissed for non-prosecution, as neither counsel nor the petitioner appeared on repeated listings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 18474 OF 2014
Between:
Smt. J.Yadamma, Wo. Narsimhulu, aged 24yrs., OccPvt. Service, R/o Ainapur Village, Doma Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Writs moreparticularly in the nature ofMandamus, thereby declaring the action of therespondent No. 5 and 6 in issuing publication calling for the applications for the CSP(CustomerService Provider),for Ainapur Village, Doma Mandal, Ranga Reddy Districtdated 21-6-2014, as againstthe guidelines specified by the respondent M.2 vide Cir.No. 398/RD-SHG/EBTl2O1O dated 26-8-2010.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2O14|WPMP. NO:23157 oF 20141
Petition under Section'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the publication issued by the respondent No. 5 & 6 in issuing publication calling for the applications for the CSP(Customer Service provider), for Ainapur Village, Doma Mandal, Ranga Reddy District dated 21-6-2014, in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI NYAYAPATHI PRASHANT (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ-RURAL DEV
Counsel for the Respondent No.S & 6: SRI P.RAGHAVENDER REDDY, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYAT
The Court made the following: OROER
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTTCEK.SARATH
WRIT PTTITIO NNo.18474 of2OL4
ORDER:
This petition is coming for hearingsince 2014. On L1.12.2O23, when the matterwas called, there was no representation on behalf ofthe petitioner,and therefore the matter was directed tobe listed today under the caption "for Dismissal". Eventoday, when the matter is called, there is no representationon behalf ofthe petitioner. It seems that thepetitioner is not interested to prosecute this case.
petition, shall stand closed.
LAH ANSARI ./ SD/- MOHD.SANAUL ASSISTANTREGIS //TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To,
B:5 sX
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0810112024
ORDER
WP.No.18474 of 2014
l'C:
(
ooJ 2 g ttB zul z
DESPATC
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION/DEFAULT,
WTHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. J.Yadamma
The Government of Telangana
Commissioner, Rural Development, Government of Telangana
The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District
The Project Director, DRDA, Ranga Reddy District
The Panchayath Secretary, Gram Panchayath, Ainapur Village
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
