Writ petition challenging allotment of Grama Kantam land to a private respondent was dismissed as abated after counsel reported the petitioner's death and absence of instructions from legal representatives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I
[3302 ]
I ( J If t
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE NINTH DAYOF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 15812OF 2009
Between:
i',U"ft li,:;:"%#:;Vlfi:?Xif 3il#,,;LiHx5,t%J"HhSTi"ts1'.1i:i*"
...PETITIONER
AND
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, orderor direction more particularlyone in the natureof writ of Mandamusdeclaringthe action of the respondentsNo. '1 to 5 in granting permission to 6th respondentover the land belongingto the Grama Kantamas illegal, arbitrary, vroltiveof AP GrampanchayathAct 1994' consequentlysel- aside the allotmentand permisstongranted to the 6th respondenton the Grama Kantam land, situatedat Amadapur Village, Moinabad Mandal' Ranga Reddy Distrrct
l.A. NO:1 OF 2009(WPMP.NO: 20743 0F2009)
Petition under section151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit frledin supportof the petition,the High Court may be pleasedto
direct respondentsNo. 1 to 5 to restrain respondent No 6 frommakingany constructionsover the landbelonging to the Grama Kantam' situatedat Amadapur Village,Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District' pending disposal of the abovewrit Petition
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRl. POTTIGARISRTOHARREDDY Counsel for the RespondentNos' 1to4:GP FORPANCHAYATRAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel fortheRespondent No.3:SRIKISHORE RAoPUSKURU (SC FOR TS ZILLAPARISHADS)
CounselfortheRespondentNo.6:SRITHADIKoNoAKoTESHWARAPRASAD Counsel for theResPondent No.S:-
The Gourt madethe following: ORDER
i I i I ! I I I I I I i I I I I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
W.P.No.158L2 of 2OO9
ORDER:
Learned counsel lor the petitioner submits that the sole petitioner died and there a-re no instructions from the
lega-l representatives of the deceased petitioner.
the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. No order as to costs.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/-N. CHANDRASEKHAR o ASSISTANT REGIS R SECTION ICER
To,
BM
BS h*
HIGH COURT
DATED:091O112024
ORDER
st ArE
6E oA
(
q
^ r !, ir 2tlit a
b ( Lr
ot
+
*
c t
DES Pr.-<br>
WP.No.15812 of2009
DISMISSINGTHE WRIT PETITION AS ABATED WITHOUT GOSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner (name illegible in text)
The District Panchayath Officer, Chevella, Ranga Reddy District
The Panchayath Secretary, Amadapur Grama Panchayath, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Extension Officer, Rural Development, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Gram Panchayat, Amadapur Village, Moinabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District
Srprim Chandrakala (Sarpanch), Amadapur Grampanchayath
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
