The High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to stop bank interference with workers as infructuous after representation that the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
t3300 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE FIFTEENTH PAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
wRlT PETITION NO: 32214 OF 2013
Between:
Kiran Potteries Workers Union, Rep. by its Secretary T.Dharmaraju, Sio.T.P.K. Suri, Having its Offrce At M/s. Kiran Potteries, K-5, lDA, Uppal, Hyderabad.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased too issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nalure of Writ of Mandamus decaling the action of the 1st and 2"d respondents in interfering and preventing the workers from manufacturing work of the 3rd respondent company as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, contrary to law and in violation of the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 19 and 20 of the Constitution of lndia and issue the consequential direction not to five effect to the sa me.
-/
I.A.NO:aOF 2013 (WPMP.NO:40066 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent not to interfere with the production of the goods in pursuance of lhe Possession Notice daled'25-07 -201 3issued by the 1St respondent bank and got published in Business Standard Hyderabad news paper on 29-07-2013 and subsequently letter dated 13-09- 2013issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI KADARI RAMA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : SMT V.DYUMANI
Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : SRI ABU AKRAM
The Court made the following ORDER
1 I I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAI(A
WRIT PETITION NO.32214 OF 2013
ORDER:
No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
and the same has become infructuous.
J. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is
dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition
shall stand closed.
SD/.N. SRIHARI
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIO FICER
To
'1. One CC to Sri Kadari Rama Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
SA
GJP
\
\
HIGH COURT
DATED:1510312024
ORDER
WP.No.32214 of 2013
.^l I
,c
: 'i'
02 (f,r
tttY 2Q{ ,tr
i)+ a
lr .. i t*,.'
',
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
4,t|rt
4P
Kiran Potteries Workers Union, Rep. by its Secretary T.Dharmaraju
Authorized Officer, Cosmos Co-Op. Bank Ltd.
Cosmos Co-Op. Bank Ltd.
Kiran Potteries Workers Union, Partnership firm
Nagesh Bheemapai
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
