Disposed

Smt. Sarikonda Udaya Laxmi v. The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.

Telangana HC14 Mar 2024WP/4217/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of four writ petitions challenging auction notices issued for property due to non-loan repayment. The court accepted a memo from the petitioners regarding an accepted one-time settlement by the bank and discharged the proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Memo regarding One Time Settlement taken on record; previous direction for account details discharged; writ petitions disposed of.

Smt. Sarikonda Udaya Laxmi Vs The District… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁰⁰¹

¶2

I l. l

¶3

HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD} ' -' iSpecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY,^{THE FIFTH DAYOFDECET,,IBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTYFOUR}

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE^{SRt JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA}

¶7

WRIT PE^{TITIONNOs:422642174220 and 4224 oF 2024}

¶8

WRIT PETITI^{ON NO:4226 0F 2024}

¶9

Between:

¶10

l.Smt.SarikondaUdayaLaxmi,W/oLateVenkataRaiu'Aoedabout65years'occ . House^{wire. dl3 i'rtiij z-':-:e bwirataNao'ar'N-earlvlaruthiSchool} District^- 507^o02'

¶11

Khammam^{(Urban), ["nJ""'p']i'i'"ni*"ri' (ni""i}

¶12

1. Sri. Sarikonda^{SudheerRaju' S/o Late} -V^enkata^{Raiu Aoed about 46 years} occ^{pv,t. Emptoye'eld;"h"'N"."73-i5..Dwrra'ta N"aoar.Nearlvlaruthi} School, Khamm* i"tj'dJ"il^{'xn'n"ap''i'-n'*eli KhammamDistrict- 507} 002 Presently^{residing at Hyderabad'}

...PETITIONERS

AND

1 The District Co-operative^{CentralBank L!d,'.Re^p- by its authorized officer'} [,4ahatma^{GandhiRoad, cu"inl'6r,5'iri,'piirlo ot} '^{Khammam - 507 003'}

¶17

1. The Special^Cadre -au^Deputy .^{Registrar/Officer on SpecialDutyDistrict} ' c'"'op#ti""'centrar n [^-r-id', rr'immam'^{Khammam District'} 3 The State of Telangana,^{Repby its PrincipalSecretary' Departmentof Co-} Operation^{Secretariate, Hyderabadl elangana'}

¶18

1. Commissioner^{of Cooperation and. Registrarof CoooerativeSocieties'} Telangana,^{3rd Floor c,i-,iJrtXip"a';iroirigE-opp Gandhi'Bhavan'Nampally'} Hyderabad

¶19

5 Sri Banoth^{Ravi, S/o Balya, Aged Major'Fl/o KhammamUrban'Khammam} District.

¶20

...RESPONDENTS

¶21

PetitionunderArticle226oflheConstitutionoflndiaprayingthatinthe circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filedtherewith' the High Court may be} pleased to^{pass order or orders direction more particularlyin the natureof Writ of} Mandamus^{by declaringthe Auction Notice dated 12 01 '2024 issued by the} Respondent^{No 2 underFormNo B and 9 of Rule 52 of clausell of sub clausee}

¶22

:=$.

¶23

of the Terangana c)o operative societies Rures 1964 attaching and proposed auctioning of property with plot No. 12, an extent of Land 200.8g Sq. yards equivalent to 167.95 Sq. meters, situated at Khanapuram Have i, Khammam Urban Revenue I.4andal, Khammam District (now constructed house), scheduled on 15.02.2024 at 11 .45 am for the nonpayment of the Ioan amount of Rs.49,2 7,51 5.S01 (llupees Forty Nine Lakhs twenty Seven thcusand Five hundred and fifte-'n rupees fifty paisa only) taken by respondent No.5 from the 1st Respondent Bank as illegal arbitrary contrary to Iarr'/ and in violation of principles of naturalj-rstice and consequen y set aside the same.

¶24

Counsel for the petitioners: SRI HAMSA DURGA PONNAM

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: SRI SR|NIVAS POLAVARAPU

¶26

Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 4: Gp FOR COOPERATTON

¶27

WRIT P ETI TION N O:42 17 0F 2024

¶28

Betwee n:

¶29

Smt. Sarrkonda Uda v o"ccuouie\ri;:H,i j:1$;"i,,:i::i,Y,imffi,{iE?fl,i"lxi^?itf; 3!i; ^nammam^{rUrbirn) Khanapuram H;;"Ii.',i;;;ram} ursrrrct _ 5o7 oo2

¶30

'8r:,r#S:tidiiiRii:#,.#%.'.T,qlf 9ri. Sarikonda Sudhe Presently residin,) ai hyoeraoad. i,'}iil'Jiiil*1x{:,;;6iimmam District - 5o7 OO2

¶31

AND

¶32

...PETITIONERS

¶33

1 -,.r1r il,:"^ P#:'8, 3f; i' R::1 1€ f E il l,S L ff f I "d, RL J l: fJH : t i?% B I: "",

¶34

2 Ihe^{SpecialCa,Jre} Deou S p^.'-cia J D u ry D istrict

¶35

coo pe la rve ce-ni= ie fffifl [f; g li[%,?fl :il,f,?"

¶36

3 s e c re ta ry, D e p a rrm e n r o r co-

¶37

5B':13f S:.l8lz I 3 il i., f; E% fJ. :,i Ji,lr.f"x

¶38

4 [ilS,iHl%F[,f^{'"'1,"#l':,lrgllrffig]'ffi} i,Zlf;"^:,,r:llifi lfl EXfi i:

¶39

5 ul;#l[flffii#'3[1x3io^{Khan, S/o Khaja,} Ased Major, R/o kihammam

¶40

...RESPONDENTS

¶41

itution^{of lndiapraying that in the} Petition^{underArticle 226 of the Const} the^{High Court maYbe} stated^{in the affidavit filed th} erewith, circumstances particul arly^{in the nature of Writ of} s order^{or orders directionmore} pleased Mandamus^to Pas^bY declaring^{the Auction Notice} datedule 52^{of clause} 12.01^{.2024 ll of issued sub clause bY thee} ResPondent^{No 2 under Form NoB and 9 of R} les^{1964 attaching and ProPosed} of the^{Telang ana Co OPerativeSocietiesRu} extent^{of Land 200 88 Sq Yards} auctioning^{ofproperty with Plot No 12' an} at KhanaPuram^{Haveli' Khammam} equivalent^{to167.95Sq. meters'situated} Urban^{Revenue Mandal'Khammam District(now constructedhouse)' scheduled} payment^{of the loan amountof} on 15.02.2O24^{at 11'45 am for the non} Thousand^{Six Hundred and Thirty} Rs.50,81'^{631.50/- (FiftY Lakhs EightY One} ndent^{No.5 from the 1st ResPondent} One^{rupeesfifty paisa only) takenby respo} d in^{violation of principlesof natural} Bank^{as illegal arbitrary contraryto law an} justice and^{consequentlyset aside the same'}

¶42

Counsel^{for the Petitioners:SRI HAMSA DURGA PONNAM} Counsel^{for the RespondentNo'1 & 2: SRI SRINIVASPOLAVARA} PU Counsel^{for the RespondentNo'3 & 4: GP FOR COOPERATION}

¶43

WRIT PETITION NO:4^220OF2024

¶44

about⁶⁵ Years'

¶45

'"T""Bpi-'f [Iaruthi^School' 507 002.

¶46

Khammam i'lqffi^{(Urban)' ,i":'{iH;$:,Hflffi I:ql;ffi ffi t$:*,i} about⁴⁶ Years, r, Near^Maruthl m District^{- 5u /}

¶47

' ;trilffi;ffi #ilillii:f#]ft+:'Hff*i

¶48

...PETITIONERS

¶49

.1 il],?,?,f^{y3133;ig*':a**..a*;l;-g1tul?i,k"j5f jg:'i"?'03{:"''":-:-}

¶50

AND

¶51

2 U:r"tgff^{st"?'-,i',%,??'rty,[.""%'l{3'J.:[f;il#l"ds'?i3l'Dutv'District} De^{pa rtm e nt or co -}

¶52

J ln,:lA':^{S:"',:BL',il:i ft??; lJ, l? J#l;fg'" ""'u''}

¶53

¶54

¶55

' 4. Commissioner , .r.etansana, 3rd ;l'"S%9:Jgiion^{and Resi} Hyder;ba;.^{-, -':roorc iuhakarpa} Et'ihiil3ltil^g, *"#rrTll:i,tl,il;Xfii,

¶56

Sri. Sangam Srid ramma'm'oi!il."^{t^Krishna} Murthy, Aged Major, R/o Khammam Urban,

¶57

"'RESP.NDENTS

¶58

"'RESP.NDENTS ... petition under Articre 2rA ^t +^^ ^ or rndia praying that in the circumstances .,,,.0 ,.n''ln"u'ff:Jl",::"il:::". rrre! tnerewith' the High Court may be pleased to pass order or "a"." ^::^^,,'^ Mandamus o, 0u.,,,.,,1 i,lj,.:il",j:.il:; ::1,.,,"n, in the nature or w,it or ed 12'01 '2024 irssued by the Respondent No 2 under Form No g and g of R u r e of the Terangan, 52 of clause ll of sub crause e "o^{o"" ,r;,;"""^:,'::} t-:'T'r:'ff"1e64^{^' "r Kl} attachins and proposed auctionins or propefty ;il"ffi ".,r,.'.1,. in.u11:"t^{"t Land 200,88sq. vards} equivarenr ro 167.9ii a" -",.." ;,:: :rx :tfi d;r;:,'J[:::,::J::::ffi^{] IIJII} ; :rm: Rs 55, 82, B5o/- (Ru p,:es ili J:' r:[.'il?i;iil ;;" J::.H,m*,; and Fifty only) 'taker by responcrent No.5 from the 1st Respondr:nt Bank as illegar arbitrary contrary to law and in vioration of principres of naturaljustice and consequenfly set asjd 3 the same.

¶59

Counsel for the petitioners: SRI HAMSA DURGA pONNAM

¶60

Counset for the Respondent No..t & 2: SRt SRIN|VAS POLAVARAPU

¶61

Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 4: Gp FOR COOPERATION

¶62

WRIT PETIT ION N O:42240F 2024

¶63

Between:

¶64

Smt. Sarikonda L,tdava I

¶65

Pr:;#iitx*iryii#,,ffi"iffffiffi '*il?rnr?xt,rirn:n;

¶66

1. Sri. Sarikonda Sudheer Rai,, c;;:,:1,:^;:.^":' 'rl-rrpft ,Ffl ,T,"f,"::ffi }ftfi:,lflff*ifl^{'giir;".r,,,.{fi}

¶67

002 Presently res ding ,t ftliil"iuUir'iI

...PETITIONERS

AND

rtl

1 The District Co-operative^{CentralBankL!d,. Rep, b,y its authorized officer'} lMahatma candhi^{Road' Grftili 6h;;ii, ps i'lo' 61' Khammam - s07 003'}

¶72

2 The Soecial Cadre^{Deputy Registrar,officer on} !pgqial^{Duty' oistrict} c'"1^p JlriiiE'cJ"iij^{i au-n I Lta', khE} ""' Kha m ma m^{Di stri ct'}

¶73

a The State of Telanqana,^{Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Departmentof Co-} Operation^{Secretariate, Hyderabad, I elangana'}

¶74

4 Commissioner^{of Cooperation andRegistrar'of CoooerativeSocieties'} Telangana.^{3rd Floor Gtrh;Hipu'B;irii"ifi'bpp Gandhi'Bhavan' Nampallv'} Hyderabad.

¶75

E Chennama^{Raju,Aged - Major,Rl/o} Sri. Vaddemanu^{Sashi Kumar, S/o} Xhu.mrm^{Urban, Khammam District}

¶76

..,RESPONDENTS

¶77

Petition under^{Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances^{stated in the affidavit filed therewith' the High Court maybe} pleased to^{pass orderor orders direction more particularlyin the natureof Writ of} Mandamus^{by declaringthe Auction Notice dated 12101t2024issued by the} Respondent^{No 2 under Form No 8 and 9 of Rule 52 of clausell of sub clause e} of the^{TelanganaCo Operative Societies Rules 1964 attaching and proposed} auctioning^{of property with Plot No 12' an extent o{ Land 200 88 Sq yards} equivalent^{to 167.95 Sq meters' situated at KhanapuramHaveli' Khammam} Urban^{Revenue Mandal, Khammam District (now constructed house),scheduled} on15'02-2024al11.-45amforthenonpaymentoftheloanamountof Rs.48,28,045i-^{(Rupees FortyEight Lakhs twenty eight thousandforty five only)} taken by^{respondentNo'5 from the 1st Respondent Bank as illegalarbitrary} contrary^{to law and in violationof principlesof naturaljustice and consequently} set aside^{the same}

¶78

Counsel^{for the Petitioners:SRI HAMSA DURGA PONNAM}

¶79

Counsel^{for the Respondent No'1 & 2: SRI SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU}

¶80

Counsel for^{teRespondent No.3& 4: Ge.gonCo9PERATION}

¶81

The Court^{madethe following:COMMON ORDER}

¶82

These writ^{petitions are disposedof by common order dated '14'03'2024} directing^{the 2nd respondentto furnish a detailed statement of account} incruding^{sanctioned amount, rate of interestregardingthe loan account of the}

¶83

' respondent No.S to the petitioners within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and upon receiving the detairecr statement, the petitioners are directed to deposit the barance amount arong with 5 % of increment of the auction bid amount within four months thereafter. rt is needress to say that incase the petitioners faired to compry with this order, the respondents are at riberty to take an appropriate action in accordance with Iaw.

¶84

This Court, on 16.10.2O24, in I.A.No.3 of 2024 in W.p.Nos.42 26, 4217, 4220 ' and 4224 0f 2024, granted an extension of time for a period of six weeks. lnadverten'y' this court directed to post these writ petitions on 26.11.2024, and later the same was adjourned on two occasions i.e., 26.11.2024 and 04.12.2024.

¶85

Today' rearned counser for the petitioners has submitted a Memo across the Bar stating that the 1st respondent-Bank has accepted the request of petitioners for One Time Set,ement (OTS) of Rs.1,11.72p00/- (Rupees One Crore Eleven Lakhs Seventy Two Thousand only). The Bank directed petitioners to pay Rs.56,00,000/_ on 09.12.2024, and balance to be paid on 16'12'2024' rt is fu rther stated that due to some technicar issues, they were unable to obtain a copy of the ors sanction retter. Learned counser, therefore, requests this court to take this Memo on record for consideration.

¶86

ln view of the submissions made by ledrned counsel, the Memo is taken on record.

¶87

To,

¶88

//TRUE COPY//

¶89

SD/. L. LAKSHMI BAB U A TAN ISTRAR FFICER

¶90

The Authorizecl Officer District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd. Mahatma

¶91

Gandhi Road Gandhi Chowk, P.B.No 61, Khammam - 507 003

¶92

The Special Cadre Deputy Registrar/Officer on Coope rattve Central Bani Ltd., Kh ammam, Khammam SpecialDistrict. Duty, District

¶93

The princi Pal Secreta ry, Department Hyderabad, Telangana, S tate of Telangana.^{ofCo-OperationSecretariate,}

¶94

4 The Commissioner of Coo I;!?,gi:?5;iEE":'o:,XT,g,X',"8,?!i"#:%o.;1t*3;"6f; :X^{j';fi jfl} EXii;

¶95

E One CC^{to SRI HAMSA DURGA PONNAIV'Advocate[OPUC]}

¶96

6 ONE CC^{tO SRI SRINIVAS POLAVARAPU,AdVOCAIE[OPUC]} 7 Two CCs to^{GP FOR COOPERATION'HighCourt for the State of Telangana} at HYderabad [OUT]

B BSR

Two^{CD CoPies}

\eL-

GJP

I t l I

1 I

HIGH COURT

DATED: 05t12t2024

COMMON ORDER

]:-i-_:--
t
.j ?, i)ovA'
c
? II p 2!2l (?7
?t
.i'
,,'.?, *
--:.=-

¶109

WP.Nos.4226, 4217, 4220 and 4224 OF 2024

¶110

DIRECTION

¶111

."d'A
fi-r-..- z<
.-1, - .p
?)4)- <br>

Smt. Sarikonda Udaya Laxmi v. The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Sarikonda Udaya Laxmi v. The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thakur Prakyath Singh Vs The State of Telengana

M/s. Vermin Solutions and Drip Irrigation Systems Vs The State of Telangana

J.J.Ilesh, , Ilaiah, S/o Peddulu, Vs Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra

Smt. Sarikonda Udaya Laxmi Vs The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.

Smt. Sarikonda Udaya Laxmi Vs The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.

Smt. Sarikonda Udaya Laxmi Vs The District Co-operative Central Bank Ltd.