Writ petition challenging Urban Land Ceiling authority's proceedings and NOC in favour of private respondents over the petitioner's land was dismissed for non-prosecution after counsel reported no instructions from the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[33021
l i
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO:21723 OF 2010
Between:
K. Murali Mohan, S/o. Late Madan Mohan Rao Represented by his GPA holder G. Harinath Rao 12-2-716, Birban, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
i ! )I
I
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order / direction or any appropriate writ, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Proc. No. 81/3285/06, dated 21.01.2008 and its consequential Proc. No.811772108, daled 23.02.2008 (NOC) issued by the 3rd respondent herein in favour of the respondents 4-1 1 for taking up any activity in the petitioners land admeasuring Ac 5-30 gts in Sy.No- 29411-12 (sy.No. 294P) situated at Gudi Malkapur, Hyderabad as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and contrary to law.
l.A. NO:'l OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 27640 OF 20101
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Proc. No.Bl/3285/06, dt. 21.O1.2008 and its consequential Proc.No.Bl/772108, dt. 23.02.2008 (NOC) issued by the 3rd respondent herein in favour of the respondents 4-11 in respect of the petitioner's land .admeasuring Ac.5-30 gts in Sy.No.29411-12 (Sy.No.294P) situated at Gudi Malkapur, Hyderabad pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI JITHENDER RAO VEERAMALLA (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : SRI M.VIJAY KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents No.4to12: SRI MOHD MOIN AHMED QUADRI
The Court made the following: ORDER
/
/,
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.21723 of 20lO
ORDER:
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on 09.11.2024, he has addressed a letter to the petitioner for further instructions in the writ petition. In spite of receiving the said letter, the petitioner has not responded to the letter. In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner filed a memo uide USR No. 12290 I, dated 11.12.2024 stating that he has no instructions from thc pctitioner and unable to proceed further in this writ pctition.
sDr- P.CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSI T REG TSTRAR
//TRUECOPY" E ION OFFICER
I
'"'l?$:BBJi":Ei+H.'IP,tE^m:'YEFsHi"Hn3gH'ri?+3:"'"",""
\
s. 8":1cto sRl MoHDMolN AHMED QUADRI'Advocate' [oPUC] 4- Two CDCoPies BSK PSK
*r
HIGH COURT
DATED:1211212024
ORDER
1 $E S IA. r.
j( (k
j,!
(,r
i j
I
1i rt8 2025
-i.
,"/t, *d'
rt
DcSPATC\ rc9
WP.No.21723 ot 2010
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION/DEFAU LT WITHOUT COSTS
t 0
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Murali Mohan
The State of A.P., represented by The Collector Hyderabad District
The Tahsildar, Asifnagar Mandal, Hyderabad District
Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad
S.J.K. Kishore
D. Vasanthi
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
