The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner physically nor virtually appeared before the court on the day of hearing.
None granted. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
\
[32551
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEN.V.SHRAVANKUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 18505OF 2014
Between:
G. Raiendranath Goud. S/o Late Sri G.JaqannathGoud, Occ Member, founO6r Family Sri VenkateshwaraSwamy Temple, Chikkadpalli R/o H No' 1- 8497 13, Chikkadpalli, Hyderabad.
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ofthe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiledtherewith,the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularlyone in the natureof writ of Mandamus declaring theaction of the Respondentsin issuing impugned proceedings Rc.No. S3/1353012013 dated17-05-20'.t4 as arbitrary, illegal and withoutjurisdiction and violative ofSection23,25and 142 of the Act,30 of 1987 and Article 14, 16 of the Constitutionof lndia, consequently declarethat the petitioner is entitled to exhibit thephoto of Founderin the temple premises'
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WPMP.NO:2 31920F 20141
Petition under section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the High court maybe pleasedto suspend the operation oiProceedingsRc. No.83/'13530/2013dated17 -05-2014 pending disposal of the Writ Petition.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2014(WPMP.NO:23193 OF 20141
petition under Section 151 CPC praiing that in the circumstanc€s stated in the affidavit filed in supportof the petition,the Highcourt maybe pleased to issue direction to display thephoto of Founderin the Templepremisespending disposal of the Writ Petition.
l.A. NO: 3 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 25072 OF20141
Between:
...PETITIONERS/ PROPOSED RESPONDENTS
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 16A of Writ Rulespraying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, theHigh Court maybe pleased to implead as p.oposed Respondent in the above writpetition
l.A. NO: 4OF 2O14(WPMP. NO: 25499 OF 2014
Between:
,PETITIONERYTHIRD PARTY
AND
...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT
Petition under Section OR 1 RULE'10 RAIV'151CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition, the High Court may bepleased to implead asproposed respondentin the above writ petition
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Between:
G. Raiendranath Goud, S/o Late JagannathGoud, Aged about 66 years,Occ: llember Founder Family, Sri Venkateshwara SwamyTemple,Chikkadpally' Hyderabad R/o H.No. 1-8-49713, Chikkadpalli, Hyderabad(Died per L.R.) G. Srinath Goud S/o. Late Sri G. RaiendranathGoud,Aged about 40 years' Occ: Business, resident ot 1 -849713,- Chikkadpally,Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER/
(L.R. of the deceased Petitioner)
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under order 22 Rule 3 and S.151 C.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,theHigh Court may bepleased to order thePetitioner, G.Srinath Goudto be brought on record as the LR of the deceased solePetitionerin W.P.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. GOVIND
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 &2: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
Counsel for the Proposed Respondents:M/s. JAYANTI S C SEKHAR
Counsel for the Proposed RespondentSRI CH. SATISH KUMAR, SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS
Counsel for the Proposed Respondent:SRI M. VENKATESWER RAO
The Court made the following:ORDER
-7
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR
WRIT PETITION No. 185O5 of 2Ot4
ORDER:
19 .OE.2O24 , when the matter was taken up for hearing, nonr: has appeared on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was listed to today under the caption 'for dismissal,. Even today also, when the matter is taken up there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner either physically or in virtual mode. Hence, there is no other option to this Court except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution.
non-prosecutron. There shall be no order as to costs.
As seqr-rel to it, Miscellaneouspetitions, if any pending,
shall stand dismissed.
I
SDi. V. KAVITHA ASSISTANTf,-E9ISTRAR //rRUE COpy// sEczroN oFFtcER
To,
BN
LS cw
1
HIGH COURT
DATED:20 t08t2024
ORDER
WP.No.18505 of ZO14
c'z - ? , .rF '- ",{/i< t. --
k
-)
oC 1'1 IiL:, nlt
o
Dr-
"]- :,a-. - -,/
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITTON FOR NON PiTOSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
cuIL @ ,ldil4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to exhibit the photo of Founder in the temple premises.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
G. Raiendranath Goud
State of Telangana
Commissioner of Endowments
N.V. Shravankumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
