Dismissed

Jumbarthi Rajam v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC18 Dec 2024WP/11483/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the Writ Petition challenging an order mutating land in favor of Miryala Uma without notice. Without going into merits, the Court granted liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent civil court to agitate their rights concerning the subject lands.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of granting liberty to petitioners to approach the competent civil court for agitating their rights in respect of the subject lands.

Jumbarthi Rajam Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2024)

[³³⁰²¹

I I I ; I I i I

I I i I

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF^DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 11483 OF 2015

¶9

Between:

¶10

'1 . Jumbarthi Rajam, S/o Pedda Bhoomaiah, aged 45 years, Occ Agriculture,

¶11

Jumbarthi Ramesh, S/o Narasimlu, aged 42^{years, Occ Agriculture,}

¶12

Jumbarthi Rajaiah, S/o Rajaiah, aged 55^{years, Occ Agriculture'}

¶13

Desaboina Narsaiah, S/o Narsaiah, aged 60^{years, Occ Agriculture,}

¶14

(All are Ryo Takkalapalli village, Kathalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District)

¶15

.....PETITIONERS

¶16

AND

¶17

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,^(Revenue), Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶18

2 The Sub-Collector, Jagityal, Karimnagar^District.

¶19

The Tahasildar, Kathalapur Mandal, Karimnagar^District.

¶20

Miryala Uma, W/o Late Prasada Rao, aged about^{50 years, Occ Household,} R/o Takkalapalli village, Kathalapur Mandal,^{Karimnagar District.}

¶21

Miryala Divakar Rao, S/o.Andal Prasad^{Rao, R/o. H.No.1-5-100414s12O1'} Anjanadri Residency, Srinagar Colony,^{OId Alwal, Secunderabad.}

¶22

(R5 is impleaded as per Court Order dated 13/11/19^{in l.A.No. A2018l-}

¶23

.....RESPONDENTS

¶24

Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution^{of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit^{filed therewith,the High Courtmay be} pleased to issue a of Writ of Mandamus or other appropriate^{writ declaringthe} order dated -10-2014 in^proceedings No.B/655/2O14^{of the 3rd respondent in so} far Sy.No.383 admeasuring Ac.4-28^{guntas situated} at^{Takkallapallivillage'} Kathalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District^{is concerned,is illegal, arbitrary,gross}

¶25

violation of^{principles of natural justice and contrary to the provisions of A.P'} RightsinlandandpattadarpassbooksAct,lgTlandrulesmadethereunderapart from^gross violation^{of Article 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and consequently} set aside the^{above said order dated -10-2014in proceedings No.B/655/2014of} the 3rd resPondent.

¶26

l.A.NO:1 oF^{2015 (WPM P.NO:15185 oF 2015)}

¶27

Petition Under^{Section 151 cPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition'the High Court may be pleased to} suspendtheorderdated-10-2014inproceedingsNo.B/655/2014ofthe3rd respondent,^{pendingdisposal of the writ petition'}

¶28

t.A.NO:1 OF²⁰¹⁸

¶29

Between:

¶30

MirvalaUma,W/oLatePrasadaRao,agedabout50years,occHousehold,Ryo i"irjLpriii^{iriitage,Kathalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District'}

¶31

...PETIIONER/RESPONDENT^No'4

¶32

ANO

¶33

'l . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its^{Principal Secretary, (Revenue)'} Secretariat,^HYderabad.

¶34

The Sub-Collector,^{Jagityal' Karimnagar District'}

¶35

The Tahasildar,^{Kathalapur Mandal, Karimnagar District'}

¶36

....RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS^{Nos'1 to 3}

¶37

4.JumbarthiRajam,S/oPeddaBhoomaiah,aged45years,oerAgriculture,

¶38

Jumbarthi^{Ramesh, S/o Narasimlu,aged 42 years, Occ Agricutture'} 6. Jumbarthi^{Raiaiah,S/o Rajaiah,aged 55 years, Occ Agriculture'}

¶39

Desaboina^{Narsaiah, S/o Narsaiah,aged 60 years,Occ Agriculture'}

¶40

(All are Fi'/o Takkalapalli^{village, Kathalapur Mandal, KarimnagarDistrict)}

¶41

6.MiryalaDivakarRao,S/o.AndalPrasadEeq,.ru".H.No.l-5-10041491201'-' lni?,"iaii ResidenCy, Srinagar Colony, Old Alwal, Secunderabad'

¶42

.....RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS

¶43

Petition Under^{sectron151 cPC prayingthatin the circumstances statedin} the affidavit^{filed in support of the petition, the High Court maybe pleased to}

¶44

/^f

¶45

vacate th€ interim^{order passed in W'P'M'P'No' 15185 of 2015 in W'P'No'} 11483 of 2015,^{dated 21-4-2015.}

¶46

Counsel for^{the Petitioners: SRI N.INDRASENA REDDY} Counsel for the^{RespondentNos.1to 3 : GP FORREVENUE} Counsel for^{the RespondentNo.4 : SRI K'VENUMADHAV}

¶47

Counsel for the^{lmplead RespondentNo'S : SRI L'HARISH}

¶48

The Court made^{the following ORDER}

¶49

¶50

1 I

¶51

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.11483 of2O15 ORDER:

¶52

This Writ Petition is filed^{to questioningthe} Proc.No.B/65512014 dated,^{Nil-10-2014,issuedby the} respondent No.3, whereby^{patta in respect of land} admeasuring to an extent of Ac-4-28 guntas in Sy.No.383, situated at^{TakkallapalliVillage was} mutated in the name of the unofficial^{respondentNo.4} by deleting the name ol lather of the^petitioners, without issuing any notice to the^{petitionersand} sought to set aside the same.

¶53

Heard the learned Counsel for the^petitioners, Iearned Assistant Government Pleader for^Revenue appearing ior the ofhcial respondents and Sri^K.Venu Madhav, Iearned Counsel for the unoflicial respondent No.4.

¶54

Aiter arguing for some time the learned Counsel for the petitioners requested to dispose of the

¶55

¶56

writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent civil court for agitating their rights in respect of the subject lands.

¶57

In view ol the submissions rnade by the learned Counsel for the petitioners, without going into merits of the case, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the competent civil court for agitating thcir rights in respect of the subject lands.

¶58

As sequel to it, Miscellareous Petitions pending, if

¶59

any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.

¶60

SD/.S.MALLIKARJUNA^RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶61

//TRUE COPY//

¶62

SECTION OFFICER

¶63

To 1 . The Principal Secretary,^{(Revenue), Secretariat, State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad.

¶64

2 The Sub-Collector, Jagityal,^{Karimnagar District.} - . . . .

¶65

3 The Tahasildar, Kathaiaiur^{Mandal,Karimnagar Distllgt'} 4 fwo CCs to GP FOR^{REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at} Hvderabad. [OUT]

¶66

5 oirl cc to SRt N^{truoResENA REDDY,Advocate} [oPUc] 6 One CC to^{SRI K.VENUIVADHAV,Advocate {OPUCI}

¶67

7 One CC^{to SRI L.HARISH,Advocate (OPUC)} 8 Two CD^CoPies

SA BSKw

HIGH COURT

DATED:1811212024

ORDER

6.; Sirr;a L.
(
+
li oo 1 I FEB ?il25 j
\r
ar,
\
, O6- Si,NTC

WP.No.11483 of 2015

DISPOSING OF THE W.P

WITHOUT COSTS.

,od4 Yr, 6r{'s

Jumbarthi Rajam v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jumbarthi Rajam v. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Gopal, Vs The State of Telangana

Manappuram Finance Limited Vs The Tahsildar

Smt. Bodapothula Rani Vs The District Collector

Rasumalla Narsimha Vs State of Telangana

Enugu Sarojana, Vs The Tahsildar, Pochampally Mandal

Nomumla Mohan Reddy (Died as per LRs Petitioners 4 to 6) Vs The Tahsildar