The High Court for the State of Telangana dismissed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Tahsildar in conducting a land survey as infructuous. No no further orders were passed by the court.
The Writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITION NO: 34907 OF 2014
Between
G. Gopal, Sio. G. Pentaiah, aged about 51 years, Occ Business, Rio. Plot No.17, Saraswarthi Nagar,Boduppal, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of l\ilandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not passing orders on the petitioners represefltation daled 27.O9.2O14 conducting the survey of the petitioners land covered under Registered Document No. 8910 of 2006 dt. O2.11.2006 on the file of Sub Registrar, Malkajgiri to an extent of 1453.33 sq. yards in Sy No. J 91 -situated--at-Kushaiguda, lCapra Municipality, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, along with Challan dt. 23.09.2014'declaring the impugned memo vide Proceedings No., MS/113/2014 dated 01.1.2O14 passed by the 4th respondent namely The Tahsildar, Keesara Mandal, Ranga Reddy District is illegal and void and opposed to Article, 14, 19,21 and 300-4 of
: i ! i
il ,1
Constitution oflndizr and consequentlydirect the respondentsto conductthd survey of thepetitiorer land in question
Prayer is amendedas per C.O.dt.8t12t14in WPMP No'46704/14
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP.NO: 43672 OF 20141
Petition undr:rsection151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled in supportof the petition,the High court maybe pleased to direct the4th respondent to consider the case of the petitioner representation dt. 27.0g.2014 forcorrducting of surveyof the petitionerland c;overedunder RegisteredDocurn€:ntNo. 8910 of 2006 dt. 02.11.2006on the file of Sub Registrar, Ivlalkajgri to an extentof 1 453.33sq. yardsin sy No. 191 situatedat Kushaiguda, !CapraMunicipality, KeesaraMandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of theman writ Petition
Counsel for thePetitioner : SRIMUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel for theRes;pondents:GP FOR REVENUE
The Court madether following:ORDER
I I i i ; ! I ! ! I ! ItIi I I
I I I i lr
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITIoN No. 349o7 of2OL4
ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ petition does not suryive ald no further orders are required to be passed in this matter, thereby, the Writ petition has become infructuous.
pending in this writ petition shalt stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/. L, LAKSHMI BABU ASSISTANT REGI STRAR
ECTION OFFICER
To,
BSK
GJP (h
HIGH COUR'I-
DATED:17112t12024
?Ff
t t'l E STAI €
(
c (<br>() 0 i1 l'lAP, 2[25
)
* {* ,,.
rl s::-a'rc
ORDER
WP.No.3490-'t of 2014
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCT'UOUS WITHOUT C()STS 0n l|H
:)., I,u
Itcolt-t-x
G. Gopal
The State of Telangana
The District Collector
The Assistant Director of Survey & Settlement
The Tahsildar
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
