Writ petition challenging Tahsildar proceedings for coercive action against a finance company under land transfer regulation and money lending laws; petitioner's counsel stated the cause no longer survived, and the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTHDAY OFDECEIVIBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK. SARATH
WRIT PETITIONNO:327220F 2011
Between:
/lanaoouram Finance Limited,Rep. by its Legal Manager, S Anand Raj' S/o' isln;"obriJr'jd;,i-ai t;;;;BhadrachalariBranch, Udav BhaskarRoad' Bhadrbchalam, Khammam District.
...'ET'T'ONER
AND
The Tahsildar, BhadrachalamKhammam District
...RESPONDENT
Petition under Article226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe pfeaseO to issue a writ, orderor directionmore particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamusdeclaringthe impugned proceedings issuedby the respondent Rc.No.4/6500/2011,dt.30.11-20,llwantedtotakecoerciveStepsagalnsltne p"tition"|l"FinanceCompanyunderA.P.ScheduleLandTransferRegulationlof igzo ano MoneyLendingnct witnout poweror authority is illegal andvoid..and opposed to Articies14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequentlyto Jirect ttre respondentnot to interfere with the petitioners business affairs without following due Processof law.
l.A. NO:1OF 2011(WPMP.NO: 40672 OF 2011)
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filedin support of the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto stay all furtherproceedings pursuant to the proceedingsRc' No A/6500/20'l1' dt 30- 11-2Ol1issuedby thi respondent, pending disposalof the writ petition'
Counsel for thePetitioner: SRI MUMMANENI SRINIVASARAO Counsel fortheRespondent: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court madethe following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITION No.32722 of 2U.17
ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ petition does not sur-vive and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter, thereby, the Writ petition has become infructuous.
to'o5tt'Eif[fHt3,!3ffi7
//rRUE coPY//
To *pirio"r.r orir.ER 1 2 J 1;g":f'a{*trHYHXtUENt'J'liL,,€f,[ifi#6?:il""t?:t"81,.,,, PSK. BSR
*pirio"r.r orir.ER
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711212024
ORDER
WP.No.32722 of 2011
.- j'= 1:-:----
a. , i:
ill i, .-,.
. ,:.";t). t..,.. '
--:-::;L;---j- _...-
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS Yr 1 Zt-l L\ 6crr(-u\
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Lanaoouram Finance Limited, Rep. by its Legal Manager, S. Anand Raj
The Tahsildar, Bhadrachalam, Khammam District
K. Sarath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
