The High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by petitioner-managers challenging a survey notice as infructuous on the submission of counsel that the cause does not survive.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3302 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATEOF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
(Special Original J urisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OFDECEil,{AER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
WRIT PETITIO N NO: 21904 OF2011
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol theConstitutionof lndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavitfiled therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to lssue writ or directionpreferably writ ofmandamusdeclaring the final notice in file No.A3/50212O11dl. 23.6.2011issued by the respondent No.3 to conduct survey as illegal, arbitrary,without authority and violative of principles of naturaljustice and consequentlyset asidethe saidnotice.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 26678oF 2011)
Petition under Section151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support ofthe petition,the HighCourt may be pleasedstay all further proceedings inpursuance of notice issued by the respondentNo.3 vide file
/
I
I I
No.A3/502/201 I dt. 23.6.2011,pending disposal of writpetition in the interest of justice.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 38295 OF 2013)
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased tostay all furtherproceedings inpursuance of the notice dt.23-10-2013 issued bythe respondent nos. 2 and 3pending disposal of the writpetition in theinterest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel forthe Respondents No.4:
The Court made the following: ORDER
/il/
I I I I I I I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE K.SARATH
WRIT PETITI ON No. 21904 of 2OLL
ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the cause in the Writ petition does not survive and no further orders are required to be passed in this matter, thereby, the Writ petition has become infructuous.
pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSIST T REGIS
/ffRUE COPY// S ON OFFICER
To,
BSK
BSRw
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711212024
t: s TA
c.
()
lti rus 1[25 C,
/t:
:l
ORDER
WP.No.21904 ot 2011
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
G,€t
Vn<"
6t
Smt. Bodapothula Rani
Sri Dhanal Venkateswadu
The District Collector, Khammam
The Assistant Director of Survey and Land Records, Khammam
SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
