Civil revision petition arising from a Family Court interlocutory order was dismissed as infructuous after counsel informed the Court that the cause no longer survived for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[26e7 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYOERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 35 16 0F 2024
Petition under Arricle 22r of the constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated file of the 09 10 court 2024 of thepassed vl Additionar in rA No.1692 District ot and sessions 2024 in GWop .luogi r(6. cum-ramil; se "t7o)2 il.t"" lni Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally.
Between:
Sri Krishna, S/olate Sri Chandrashekaran, Aged about 4g years, Occ. Pvt Employee. R/o F506, Manjeera Diamond fowtii, Copanpafi,y, n'n-Oist rict500046
...Petitioner
AND
Manohita Gurram. Wo Sri Krrshna, Age_d about 43 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o C 1 01 . Manjeera Diamond Towers] Copanpaity,'ninga neAOy bistri;t _ 500046
...Respondent
lA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petitron under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in.the affidavit frted rn support of the petition, ine Higfr Court may b;;L;;;1" allow the revision petitron and consequenfly "usp.-rdthe operation'oro..o"i" dated 09 10 2024 tn rA No.1692 of 2024, the petitioner wifi be put to irr"prrroi. loss and injury whrch cannot be compensated in any manner.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri S Nagesh Reddy
Counsel for the Respondent : Sri Sridhar Lonkala
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHA\rILI
C.R.P.No.3516 OFAU
ORDER:
'When the mafter s taken up for hearing, leamed
counsel appearing for the petitioner had informed this Court that the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the said submission, the Gvil Revision
Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
lvfscellaneous petitions, i[ any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/. P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /i\LOFFICER [/Uecrror.r
To,
ADt(gh
\y
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611212024
ORDER
CRP.No.3516of 2024
e { ttE S It rC
o
k
e $
.) (
7
2 4 rrB 2025
C,
t
Ci,t..
J=/
DISMISSINGTHE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOUTCOSTS
<br>a- t
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sri Krishna
Manohita Gurram
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
