Dismissed
Sri Krishna v. Manohita Gurram
Telangana HCCRP/3514/2024
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[26s71
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAV]LI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3514 OF 2024
Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order 09.10.2024 in lA No. 1691 ol 2024 in GWOP No. 38 of 2022 on the file of the Court of the Vl Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Family Court, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally
Between:
Sri Krishna, S/o Late Sri. Chandrashekaran, Aged about 48 years, Occ. Pvt Employee, R/o F506, Manjeera Diamond Towers, Gopanpal ly, R R District500046.
...PETITIONER
AND
Manohita Gurram, Wo Sn Krishna, Aged about 43 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o C101, Manjeera Diamond Towers, Gopanpally, R R District-500046.
...RESPONDENT
A NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petrtion, the High Court may be pleased to allow the revision petition and consequently suspend the operation of orders dated 09.10.2024 in lA No 1691 of 2024, the Petitioner will be put to irreparable loss and injury which cannot be compensated in any manner.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri S. Nagesh Reddy
Counsel for the Respondent: Sri Sridhar Lonkala
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
\ I
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
C.R.P.No.3514 OF 2024
ORDER:
lff4ren the rnafter is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel appearing for the peridoner had informed this Coun that the cause in the civil revision pedrion does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the said submission, the Gvil Revision
Petition is dismissed as infrucruous. No cosrs.
IvQqq[11qgp petigjons, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/. MOHD. ISUIAIL ASSTSTANT REG|SIRAR //TRUE COPY// -tN SECTION OFFICER
I
To, 1 The. .Vl_ Additional District and Sessions Judo ^neooy oisirici'Ii'ftrriatp"lry. -e-cum-FamilvcourtRanga 2. One CC to Sri S Nageih Heddy, Advocate [OpUC] 3 one CC to Sri sriarral ronraLla&i,tri"'foir]ci 4. Two CD Copies VH/gh
+j,
\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0611212024
1 P.E 5TA IA
(
e
o
2 4 i[B 21125 vaz
* r\t--r".,r^eCn
ORDER
CRP.No.3514 of 2024
DISMISSING THE CRP
AS INFRUCTUOUS
@
L(
Sri Krishna
Manohita Gurram
Abhinand Kumar Shavli
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court