The High Court closed the contempt case filed against respondents for violating the impugned order. However, the court directed petitioners to be at liberty to challenge the rejection proceedings dated 24.02.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[26e71
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 170 OF 2021
Contempt Case filed under Sections 10lo12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondents herein for their Willfully, deliberately and intentionally violating of the Orders of the High Court dated 1411212020 made in WP No.22683 of 2020.
Between:
...Petitioners
AND
...Respondents
/,/
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 R/w B1 ofR.P. Actpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedin support ofthe petition,the High Court may be pleased to delete thisrespondentno 3 from contempt case No. 17012021 in WP NO 2268312020.
Counsel for the Petitioner No. 1:SRl. ARVIND KUMARKATA
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to3: GP FOR PRSRO(RWS) DEPT.,
The Court made the following: ORDER
,'/
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SI{AVILI
C.C.No.170 OF 2021
ORIIER:
$flhen the maner is uken up for hearing, learned Govemment Pleader appearing for the respondents had informed this Coun rhat in pursuzlnce of the orider dated 14.12.2020 passed by this Coun in,W.P.No.22683 of 2020, the cases of rhe petitionerc were considered and rejeeed uide proceedings d^ted 24.02.2022.
kamed counsel appearing for the petitionen does nor dispute the said [act.
In view of rhe same, rhe C-ontempt Gse is closed. F{owever, the petitioners are at liberry to challenge the said rejection proceedings dared 24.02.2022, I they are so advised. No costs.
Miscellaneou petitions, if any, pend ins shall s nd cl Sd,. T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
CTION OFFICER
To,
ougn 4{z
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611212024
ORDER
CC.No.170 of 2021
rk 5iArE O
1 ,
q .ltfl
o 2 5 tt'i
c, .l;
+/
I DesPnr o \l( ',/
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE
&
9.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to delete Respondent No. 3 from the contempt case.
A. Yadaiah
S. Lingaiah
Y. Narasrmha Reddy
V. Bixam
E. Venkatesham
Sri K. Suresh
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
