L. Ram Narayana v. Sri Sd. M. Subhani and 2 others
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt petition after the respondent established that terminal benefits, except gratuity, were paid pursuant to a prior order. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue remedies for the withheld gratuity separately.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to pursue remedies regarding payment of gratuity separately.
What the court decided
[26e71
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENW NINTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2905 OF 2018
Contempt Case filed Under Sections 10 & 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent herein for wilfully, disobeying the Orders of the High Court dated 14-12-2017 passed in WP No. 23086 of 2003.
Between:
L. Ram Narayana, S/o. L.Venkateswara Rao, Aged about 71 years, Driver (Retd) E.C.No.2883674, O/o. Workshop Divisional Engineer, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur Area, Adilabad District.
...PETITIONER
AND
- Sri SD. M. Subhani, General Manager, Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Srirampur Area, Adilabad Diskict.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent wilfully disobeyed the High Court orders?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
L. Ram Narayana
- respondent
Sri SD. M. Subhani
- respondent
Sri N. Sridhar IAS
- respondent
Dr. Viayalaxmi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CC/2905/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court