A criminal revision case arising from a cheque-related conviction appeal was dismissed because the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear or prosecute the case despite listing under a 'for dismissal' caption. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 131 OF 2024
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.PC against the Judgment daled 0110712022 made in Crl.A.No.21 of 2021 on the file of the Court of the VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad preferred against the Judgment daled 2710212020 made in C.C.No.96 of 2018 (Old C.C.No.541 of 2018) on the file of the Court of the XIX Special Magistrate, Hyderabad.
Between:
K. Pranil Reddy, S/o H.K. Anji Reddy, Aged 33 years, Occ. Private Employee, R/o H.No.2-'1'15l1 , Near Ramaswamy Function Hall, Vijaypuri Colony, Uppal, Hyderabad.
...Revision Petitioner
AND
... Res ponde nts/Co m p la ina nt
IA NO: 3 OF 2024
Petition under Section 389(1) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order d1.011O712022 passed in CRL.A.No.21 o'f 2021 on the file of VII Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad confirming the judgment dt.2710212020 passed in C.C.No.96 of 2018 (Old C.C.No.541 of 2018) on
the file of XIX Special Magistrate, Hyderabad by granting bail to the petitioner, pending disposal of the main revision in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Shabana Munawar( No representation)
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : Sri Jithender Rao Veeramalla, Additional Public Prosecutor
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.131 OF 2024
ORDER:
There was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 19.07.2024 and 17.10.2024. Therefore, this Court directed the Registry to list this matter on 24.10.2024 under the caption, "for dismissal". Despite listing the matter under the said caption, on there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner 24.10.2024. Even today, there is no representation.on behalf of the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not evincing any interest to prosecute the case.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. K. SAILESHI DEPUTYREGISTRAR //TRUECOPY// 'i.l 1 \ SECTION OFFICERI
To,
i. fne XrXSpecial Magistrate,Hyderabad- 3. Two CCsto the Public piJecuiot'Hign Court for the Stateof Telangana at Hvderabad [OUT] 4 6it; cc i;i;i snluan"Munawar' Advocate [oPUC]
ADt(gh
HIGH COURT
DATED:0711112024
ORDER
CRLRC.No.131 ot 2024
DISMISSING THE CRLRC FOR NON PROSECUTION
{
LoW
<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal revision case should be dismissed for non-prosecution given repeated absence of the petitioner.
K. Pranil Reddy
The State of Telangana
Vijay Kumar
M. Swapna
M. Sai Akshya
M. Sai Divya
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
