The State informed the Court that the underlying criminal case was referred as 'un-detected'. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the criminal petition seeking quashing and stay as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
,I
[32ee ]
I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TU_Egq{Y, THE FTFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWo rHousAND AND rweruri roun-''
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 161 4 0F 2021
Between:
Padarabinda Balabantaray, , p-adra Binda Ray, S/o. Sh. prafulla Kumar B,X'X'fi 3i3-,'r"',S3,l'kf""ft .U5,,ySf*i**lt,v,aroait,zii"F["i)iHin
... Petitioner/A4
AND
...Respondent
Petition under section -4g2 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or criminai petition, the High court may be pleased to ca, for the records rerating to ,nJ conne"ted with the proceedings in cr' No. 4s2 of 2020. dated 18.12.20i20 on ir.," iiru of station House officer, Janagaon. Police station, and quash the same in so far as petitioner/A4 is concerned.
f.A. NO:2 oF 2021
Petition under Section -482 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or criminir Fetition, the High court may 9: {":::9to grant stay of ail fu.rtn",pro.u"Oing. in Cr.No.452 of 2020, dated 18'12'2020 on the fire of -statio.n Hbr." oti'.Lr, Janagaon porice station including the appearance of the Accused tiil the iisposar of the Main euash Petition in the interest of the justice.
:
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri B.siva Kesava Reddy, Advocate for the petitioner and sri Jithender Veerama[a, Additional Pubric prosecutor on beharf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINALPETITIONNo. 1614 OF 2021
ORDER
Sri B.SivaKeshava Reddy,learned counsel for petitioneraS'' r,r,e1l as SriJi1-hender Rao Veeramalla,learned ''\dditionalPublic Prosecutor forthe respondentNo. 1-State are present
dismissed as infructuous
2
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any,
shall stand closed.
SD/. P.PADMANABHA REDDY, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
SVS
w
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0511112024
.;\ p.l E oF r<br>n
I
\N l$h
I
irt(
oo
l{
-IO
ORDER
CRLP.No.1614 o12021
DISMISSING CRIMINALPETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS
,('1"
s
fre,
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition for quashing FIR and staying proceedings survives when the case is declared un-detected?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Padarabinda Balabantaray
State of Telangana
Bandaru Srinivas
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
