Dismissed

Kilari Manohar v. The State of Telangana and another

Telangana HC5 Nov 2024CRLP/792/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C as infructuous. The Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the case against the petitioner had become moribund as the accused concerned was found not guilty in the final report filed by the police.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No.792 of 2021 dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applications closed.

Kilari Manohar Vs The State of Telangana and… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT FryDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY,TTIE FIFTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

Criminal Petition No.792 of 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Kilari Manohar, S/ o. Krishna Rao, Age 50 years, Occ. Present Corporator, Vengalraonagar, Hyderabad, R/o H.No.8-3-167/R/82 and83/601, Navashakthi Prahlad Plaza, Rajeevnagar, Yousufgrrda, Hyderabad-500045.

¶8

..Petitioner/Accused No.1-

¶9

AN Il

¶10

The State of Telangana, through Station House Officer, P.S., Cyber Crime, Hyderabad Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad.

¶11

G-Dedeepya,W / o. Vijay Kumar, Age 30 years, Occ. Elected Corporator, Vengalraonagar, Hyderabad, R/o.H.No.G-55, 56, Laxmi Vihar Apartments, Flat No.303, Madhura Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶12

... Respondent/Complainant.

¶13

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to QUASH the proceedings in Cr.No-2533 of 2020 on the file of the police, P.S. Cyber Crime, Hyderabad District against the Petitioner/ Accused No.1 in the interest of justice.

¶14

I.A. NO: zOF 2O2l

¶15

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Crimina[ l'etition, the l{igh Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all the further proceedings including arrest of the Petitioner/ Accused No.1 in Cr.No.2533 of 2020 on the file of the police, P.S. Cyber Crime, Hyderabad District pending disposal of the above criminal petition.

¶16

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S.Surender Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri L.N.R. Rajeshwar Rao, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

I t

¶19

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL}

¶20

CRIMINAL^{PETITIONNo.792 0F 2o2L}

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Sri S.Surender^{Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner'Sri} Jithender^{Rao Veeramalla, learnedAdditional Public Prosecutor} for the^{State-respondentNo. 1 and Sri LNR RajeshwarRao'} learned counsel^{for respondent No'2 are present'}

¶23

When the matter^{has been taken up for hearing' Iearned} Additional Public^{Prosecutorfor the State-respondent rvhile} furnishing a^{copy of Letter dated O3'07'2024 issued by the Sub} Inspector ol^{Police,Cyber Crimes Police Station' CCS'DD'} Hyderabad Citv,^{submitted that thismatter hasbecome} infructuous and^{the cause in this Criminal Petition does not} survive as final^{report has been filed due to lack of evidence and} prayed to close this^{CriminalPetition'}

¶24

The Lt:tter dated^{O3.O7.2024filed by the learned Additional} Public Prosecutor^{for the State-respondent No'fissued by the} Sub-lnspector of^{Police,Cyber Crimes Police Station' CCS' DD'} Hyclerabad City,^{is taken on record.}

¶25

¶26

4 Recording the above submission,^{this Criminal Petition is}

¶27

disrnissed as infructuous

¶28

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous^{applications, if any,}

shall stand closed.

ASS?SfAvliiHS'E+itR

,,TRUE COPY'/ TD^,

SECTION-OFFICER

toi. ,n. *u Additionat (

¶36

a:n:tq'r,.',Ii'$*liiffit$:,1':,[.i",,;#:',:"";Hropuc, ; il; aa^{io tt'" puutit Prosecud'-High court.l}

¶37

one^{cc to sri L'N'Ii: R;Hh;;;'R"o7Advocate [oPucl}

¶38

Two^{CD CoPies}

JCK/gh

q {

I I I

HIGHCOURT

DATED:05/11/2024

ORDER

CRLP.No.792 of 202.7

\ rrt Sf4/
(ot ( (,,,
(r
co) 3t [l: u ttA :
jj. a
, Dr
sF,r'. rC Hs_{)

¶48

Dismissing the Criminal Petition as infructuous.

¶49

.rrv.1
0
\qD

Kilari Manohar v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kilari Manohar v. The State of Telangana and another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vuppu Ponnamma Vs T.Saidulu

Macherla Deendayal @ Veeraswamy Sambaiah Vs Kotagiri Laxmi

S. Suresh Vs The State of Telangana

Subramaniam Appasundaram Vs The State of Telangana

Padarabinda Balabantaray , Padra Binda Ray Vs The State of Telangana

Yelle Uday Kumar Vs The State of Telangana