Dismissed

Subramaniam Appasundaram v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC5 Nov 2024CRLP/1465/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought quashing of proceedings against them in a criminal case; after the charge sheet was laid before the competent court, counsel submitted the petition did not survive and sought dismissal with liberty.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous with liberty to avail alternative remedies; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

Subramaniam Appasundaram Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^32s91

¶2

IN THE^{HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY ,THE^{FIFTHDAY OF NOVEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTYFOUR}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRIJUSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL}

¶6

CRIMINAL^{PETITION NO: '14650F 2024}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Subramaniam^{Appasundaram,S/o'} ,Appasundaram'^{Aged 59 'Years'} 'OccBusiness,^{nvo. No.iIJJt-itLiintati"North cadwell'New Jersev'US'A-} 07006.

¶9

¶10

Rajnikanth^{Appasundaram,S/o Appasundaram' Aged about57- Years' Occ -} Business,^{oro r'ro.a,iiJw'N"'i, ir't No3'GroundFloor' Lalitha Nagar' 'tst} StreetMylapore,chennai600004 ...pETrfloNER/AccusEDNos.s&6

¶11

AND

¶12

The State^{of Telangana,Rep by StationHouseOfficer' Police Station Central} crime Station.^{n"p*r"i.i"oiniJugnits PublicProsecutor,Highcourt for the} State of^{Telangana at HYderabad}

¶13

Krishnam^{nai, rariojnollslo'ivs'oou'u1-''Ag-edabout--64 years' occ-} Business,^{H No. Vltla-i1', Phase-'l'Bloomfield Elation' Khajaguda'} HYderabad.T.S

¶14

..RES'ONDENTS

¶15

Petitionundersection4S2ofCr.P.Cprayinothatinthecircumstances stated in^{the Memorand,,"ot c.*a'} of Cri;in;l.Fetition'^{the High Court may} be^{pteased to call for th" ;;;rd-;;; ciNo 230 ot 2023 dt'03/08/2023 on the file} of the Honouraore^{xrr noilil-n;iir,i"rrr/l.tropotitanMagistrateat Hyderabadand} quash the same.

¶16

l.A. NOI^{10F 2024}

¶17

Petition under^{Section482 of Cr'P'C prayin-g that in the} 'circumstances stated in^{the Memorandrr"otb.uno, of criminil..petition, the High court may} -of -'fil"thtt procee.dinos including arrest of the be oleased^{to grant stay} ffi,i.""?,",, ,,il;;i^{i"1'i,i c;. N;.'iio or zoztdt.o5/08/20230n the fire of the} i-tonourabte^{Xl I AdditionalC"ni"i'ili"trlp"f itan Magistrateat Hyderabad' pending} disposal^{of the aboveCriminal Petition'}

¶18

This Petition^{coming on for hearing,upon} .perusing^{the Memorandumof} Grounds of^{Criminal F"iition and upon. . hearinq the argumentsof} Sri NIHAL^KOWALI ,ni*i"t"^{for the 'Petitionerina Sti JithenderRao} Veeramalta,^{the Additionai'p"r-uiiJp..""utor_(TG)on behalfof the Respondent} No.1 and^{Sri P. Subhashii";;;i"Appearedfor the Respondent No 2'}

¶19

The Court^{made the following: ORDER}

¶20

¶21

:q.si

¶22

,i :i., .*1 + rttYEitri..l-,-. .: !,' ', i, - -i

¶23

: t. : 1

¶24

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VI}NUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION N0.1465 OF 2:0/24

t;. i,

..,1 1:l;i

ORDER:

The present Criminal petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings against the per-itioners/A5 and A6 in Cr.No.230 of 2023 on the file of XIt Additiona_l Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad.

¶30

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional public Prosecutor for respondent-State.

¶31

When the matter is taken up for hearirrg, L,:arned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that cause in the Criminal Petition does not survive as the chaqle sheet is laid before the competent Criminal Court. Henc:, seeks to dismiss the Criminal petition as infructuour; grzrnting liberty.

¶32

karned Additional public prosecutor takes no objection to the same

¶33

-t i tl' r-.,, [ ;,' i.,. I^{.. -,,:l:} l. I :- i r.'

¶34

¶35

Recording the^{abovemade submissions, the Criminal} Petition is dismissed^{as infructuous.It is needless to} mention that the^{petitionersare at liberty to avail} alternative remedies,^{if any, in accordance with law}

¶36

As a sequel, miscellaneous^{petitions pending, if any,}

¶37

shall stand closed.

¶38

,,TRUE^COPY//

¶39

^ss[l^lT',Xlt\3,',-'JJ^/

S TloN^OFFICER

To,

u ⁿ*u,$$i31il11,ffi

i r*o CCs^{to Public Pros'}

Hvderabad[OUTI'

z. two^{CD CoPies'}

ARigh

H-

HIGH COURT

DATED:0511112024

ORDER

CRLP.No.1465 ot 2024

DISMISSING THE CRL.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS.

¶55

.\o^c wr^{^n?.l</sup> Y+5ilffi}

Subramaniam Appasundaram v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subramaniam Appasundaram v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vuppu Ponnamma Vs T.Saidulu

Macherla Deendayal @ Veeraswamy Sambaiah Vs Kotagiri Laxmi

S. Suresh Vs The State of Telangana

Kilari Manohar Vs The State of Telangana and another

Padarabinda Balabantaray , Padra Binda Ray Vs The State of Telangana

Yelle Uday Kumar Vs The State of Telangana