Dismissed
M/s. Gautam Trading Co., v. M/s. Sri Laxmi Srinivasa Traders
Telangana HCCRLA/466/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
What the court decided
AI extract
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32es ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY ,THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 466 OF 2018
Appeal filed under Section 378(a) of Cr.P.C., against the Judgment dated 18.06.2015 passed in Crl.Appeal No. 612 of 2015 on the fite of the Court of the Special Judge for Trial of Offences under SCs and STs (POA) Act cum Vl Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Secunderabad preferred against the Order dated 04.0'1 .2018 passed in C.C No, 696 of 20'13 (old C.C.No. 1335 of 20'13) on the file of the Court of the Xl Special lVlagistrate, Secunderabad at Hyderabad.
Between:
M/s. Gautam Trading Co., Rep. by its Proprietor, Gautam Ganeriwal, S/o. Vinod Ganeriwal, Age - 33 years, Occ - Business, Havinggiven Authorityin Favour of Manager and Liasion Officer, E.B. Jairaj Naidu, S/o. Late Narayan Rao Naidu, Age - 48yrs, Occ - Manager and Liasion Officer, 2-1-113, First Floor, Tobacco Bazar, Secunderabad - 500 003.
...Appe lla nUC om pla in a n t
AND
..Respondents/Accused No. 1 and 2
.. Res pond e nURes po n d e nt No3.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C.,praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be
pleased may be pleased to suspend the operation and effect of the Judgment in New CC No. 696 of 2013 (Old CC No. 1335 of 2013), dated 18-06-20'15 on the file of the Xl Special Magistrate, Secunderabad at Hyderabad., pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal.
Counsel for the Appellant : Sri Lattupally Anand (Not present)
Counsel for Respondent No.2 : Sri Puli Mamidi Shashidhar Reddy
Counsel for Respondent No.3 : Smt. S. Madhavi, Assistant Public Prosecutor Counsel for Respondent No.1 : None appeared
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
I
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL APPEAL No.466 OF 2018
JUDGMENT:
On 19.11.2021, this Court had issued notice and the same was returned as rejected. Thereafter, the matter was represented and time lvas sought. There was no representation on behalf of the appellant on 24.06.2024 and O1.O7.2024
2
.i
prosecution.
Miscellarreous Petitions, pending if any, shatl stand closed.
Sd/. T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
ECTION OFFICER
To,
NjbiDr_
?*q,
HIGH COURT
DATED:0510812024
1|ie sj IA
o 16 iili ,;ti4 6'(
.t
JUDGMENT
CRLA.No.466 of 2018
8'.t(. la\16\ztt'
DISMISSING THE CRLA FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Gautam Ganeriwal
Sri Laxmi Srinivasa Traders
State of Telangana
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court