Petitioners filed a writ petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash criminal proceedings. The Court held the petition infructuous as the parties had compromised and the lower trial court disposed of the case on 10.04.2021.
The Criminal Petition was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying case was disposed of following a compromise.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3778 OF 2020
Between:
...Petitioners/Accused No.2 to 4
AND
...Respondents/Defacto Complainant
Petition under Section2182 of Cr.P.Cpraying thatin the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C No.629 of 2019 on the file ofthe Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class,Prohibition 'and Excise offences Court at Sangareddy.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of CriminalPetition,the HighCourt may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including appearance ofthe petitioners/Accused No.2 to 4 in C.C No.629 of 2019 on the file oftheSpecial Judicial Magistrate of First Class,Prohibition and Excise offences Court at Sangareddy, Pending disposal of thepetitionfor quashing.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusingthe Memorandumof Grounds of Criminal Petition and uponhearingthe argumentsof Sri Ramesh Babu
,
7 ,z -:
Pedapalli, Advocate for the Petitioner and Smt S.Madhavi, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None appeared for the Respondent No.2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I I
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
CRJMINAL PETITIoN No.3778OF 2O2O
ORDER:
This Criminal Petitionis filed r'rnder Section482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,1973 (for short 'Cr'P'C'J by the petitioners, who are arrayedas AccusedNos'2.to 4 seekingto quash the proceedings againstthem in C'C'No'629 of 2Ol9 on the file ofSpecial Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Prohibition andExcise Offences Court at Sangareddy'
2
re
fulfrlled and no cause survives in this criminal petition, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.
infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shalt
stand closed.
Sd/- P. PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTAN REGISTRAR I
7
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
l.TheSpecialJudicialMagistrateofFirstClassProhibition&Exciseoffences court at SangareddY. z. ine station ilor."bffi""t,RC Puram Police Station' Cyberabad' Hyderabad 5. r*o Cc. tothe public prosecutor, High court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] +. oi,! cC to'Sri RimeshBabu Pedapalli, Advocate[OPUC] 5. Two CDCoPies
Svs/DL
4rz
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:01 10812024
-. - -:_--
r'it- 5 .-'.,
-, | ,
?fi;t
\i,
'
.,"; I/./. ,.,/
ORDER
CRLP.No.3778 of 2020
DISMISING THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS
Ltlv rr\to\1h
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has become infructuous due to bail and disposal of the criminal case below.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Kalava Shivalaxmi Devi
Kalava Muralidhar
Yelam Sriramulu
State of Telangana
Kalava Jyothirmai
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
