Contempt case filed for violation of interim order dismissed as respondents (including deceased and non-existent committee) could no longer be adjudicated upon. Petitioners advised to approach pending writ petition.
Contempt case closed; pending miscellaneous applications stood closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3295 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1593 OF 2019
Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondents herein for deliberate, violation and willful disobedience of the order made in l.A.No.1 of 2019 in W.P. No. 21519 of 2019 dated 26.09.2019.
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A JAGAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI FARHAN AZAM KHAN
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR HOME
Gounsel forthe Respondent No.3: SRI MAK MUKHEED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON' BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHAS KAR REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO.1593 oF 2019
ORDER:
This contempt case is fiied alleging wilful and deliberate violation on the part of the respondents in complying with the interim order dated 26.og-2o1g passed by the learned Single Judge in LA.No.1 of 2019 in W.P.No.2t519 of 2Ot9.
It is stated by the learned counsel appearing for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 that respondent No.l herein is no more and respondent No.3_manging committee is also.not in existence by virtue of afflux of time and as such the present contempt case as filed against them does not survive for adjudication.
In view of the same, the contempt case is closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to agitate ar their grievances, if any, in the pending writ petition.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall
stand closed.
Sd/. K. SAILESHI DEPUry REGISTRA R //TRUE COPY//
To
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT DATED:2011212024
ORDER CC.No.1593 of 2019
o g T!ll: 5 ,.q
l^"
l)
2o ffB 2W
rc ll i---t+
CC IS CLOSED
g cq"qE$ Yt_ G{\n
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case survives for adjudication against respondents who have ceased to exist.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Syed Khaja Akram Ali
Syed Kha.1a Mukram Ali
Sri Sajeed
Sri John Diwakar
Mohd Arshad Ali
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
