Petitioner sought writ relief against interference with land possession. The Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it accordingly without costs.
None granted. The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32e6 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD ' (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 9732 OF 2023
Between:
Paftabhirami Reddy, S/o.Sri Veeraswamy Reddy aged about 78years, Occ.Business, R/o.Block No-2, Punnami Paradise, lskon City, Nellore, AP, rep. by his GPA Hoider Mohd. Riyaz S/o.Mohd. lqbal, aged about 37years, Occ.Business, Ri./o.H.No./10-6-41 8, Syed Nagar, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
RR 5 & 6 are impleaded asper C.O. dt.03-07.m23 in l.A.No.2 /2023.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus deciaring the action of the respondentsmore particularlythe 2M respondent and its officials in interferingwith possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over land bearing Sy.Nos.310/1and 31012 (old Sy.No.19/140) total admeasuring Ac.9-1 1 Gts., situated atKandikal Village, BandlagudaMandal, Hyderabad District, with the help of4th respondent,that too withoutfollowing the
) i I I I ! I I 1
/
procedure as contemplated under law, is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional, violation of principles of naturaljustice, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over subject property.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents and their subordinates not to interfere withpeaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over land bearing Sy.Nos-310/1 and 310/2 (old Sy.No.19/140) total admeasuring Ac.9-11 Gts., situated at Kandikal Village, Bandlaguda Mandal, Hyderabad District, without following the procedure as contemplated under law,pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI L.RAM SINGH
Counsel for the Respondent No.l & 2: GP FOR lRRl & COMM AREA DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.3 & 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5 & 6: SRI M.V.HANUMANTHA RAO
The Court made the following: ORDER
I iI t I I I I j
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.973 2 of2O23
ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner requests the Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw this writ petition.
Permission as sought for is accorded.
Accordingly, the writ petition ts dismissed as
withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if I shall stand closed.closed. SD/. T. JAY E ASSISTANT REGIS R
any, shall stand closed.closed.
//TRUE COPY//
To,
SECTION OFFTCER
HIGH COURT
DATED: 1911212024
ORDER
1 H
( s
1(
' ',.'] : ,lI
WP.No.9732 of 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS (fi
ts.V 15'
4cs(^$^
Paftabhirami Reddy
State of Telangana
The Executive Engineer, Irrigation and CAD Department, Hyderabad
The District Collector, Hyderabad District
The Tahsildar, Bandlaguda Mandal, Hyderabad District
R. Prakash
C.V. Bhaskar Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
