The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition seeking conversion of contingent employees to full-time posts and regular pay scales as infructuous, noting that the cause of action no longer survived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31671
I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Originat Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITI ON NO: 81 05 0F 2004
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0t the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to convert the services of the petitioners as full time contingent emproyees as there are vacancies avairabre in the 1st Respondent schoor and in consequence thereof to direct the Respondents to pay regular pay scares attached to the fufl time contingent posts rike other contingent emproyees by decraring the action of the Respondents by not converting the Services of the petitioners as fufl time contingent emproyees is illegal and violative of Articres 14 & 16 of constitution of rndia by issuing a writ, more particurarry in the nature of writ of Mandamus or any other writ, order or direction as this hon,ble Court maydeems fit and proper
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2004 Wl'MP. NO: 10547 0F 20041
Petrtron under iection 151 CPCprayingthat in thecir')-' nstancesstated in the affidavit filed irr s .rpportof thepetition,the High courtrr,ryb e pleasedto direct the Responderr s topay the regular minrmum pav scal::,attachedto the contingent employeet; in everymonthforthwith
t.A. NO: 10F 2004(W''MP.NO: 2932 OF 2004
Between:
..pETrroNERSiRE:;poNDENTS
AND
Petition under I e:tion'1 51 CPCprayingthat in the cir(:trlnstances stated in the affidavit filed ir strpportof the petition,the High Courtrnaybe pleasedto vacate the interim rrCers dt23.07 .2004 in theWPNo .10t)4712004in WP No. 810512004
Counsel for the Petitir'ners: SRl.V. V. NARASIIITHA RAO
Counsel for the Respr ndents:SRl. N. BHUPALREDDY
The Court made thef r llowing:ORDER
I l I I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
IVRIT PETITION No.81O5 OF 2OO4
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners has stated that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive
Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if
any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- G. SIREESHA ASSISTANT--BEGISTRAR ,/TRUE COPY// (fi SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRl. V. V. NARASIMHA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRl. N. BHUPAL REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CD copies BM
GJP
I
HIGH COURI'
DATED:1 0104,2023
ORDER
,- . Yr1 >:'1i:: .
t'. i'
.:'
i4 N ?n8 i
l
WP.No.8105 r:f 2004
DISMISSING-I HE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTI. OUS WITHOUT COSTS
Qa. 1A"1\11
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking conversion of contingent employees to full-time posts survives.
Whether to grant a writ of mandamus directing regular payment scales to contingent employees.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Azmeea Swamv Navak.
Madi Raiaiah
The principal, A.p.T.w. Residentiar schoor, Kataram
The Member- St cretary, Gurukulam
Justice A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
