The High Court of Telangana dismissed a decades-old writ petition under Article 226 for non-prosecution, as the petitioner's counsel did not appear despite the court's earlier notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31671
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TENTH DAYOF APRIL TWO THOUSAND ANO TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 27691 OF 2007
Between:
M/s. Prince Shoe Mart, Station Road, Warangal, Rep by Sri G. Venu Madhava Rao, S/o. G. Rathaiah, aged about 35years Occ :Business, R/o. Warangal...'ET'T.ONER
ANO
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Anide 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records from the lst and 2nd respondents and issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, and quash the Order passed by the 2nd respondent, dated 26-5-2006 in S.E. No. 8 of 2005, and confirmed by 1st respondent in S.A.No.1 of 2006, dated 22-11-207, as illegal, unjust, contrary to law, perverse and without jurisdiction, and grant all consequently benefits.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP. No: 36214 0F 2007)
Petition under Section 15'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of.the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Order passed by the 2nd respondent, dated 26-5-2006 in S.E. No- 8 of 2005, and confirmed by 1st respondent in S.A.No.1 of 2006, dated 22-11-2007 , pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A.K. JAYAPRAKASH RAO (NOT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 2: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.3: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: OROER
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27691 OF 2OO7
ORDER:
When the matter \ras taken up for hearing on 23.03.2023, there \'as no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and therefore the matter was directed to be listed on 10.04.2023 under the caption "For Orders". Despite the same, even today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Having regard to t he above, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present wrlt petltlon
Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stald closed.
SO/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT RE IS R //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To, 1. One CC to SRt A K JA YAPRAKASH RAO Advocate IOPUCI 2. Two CCs to cp for Lab our, Hrgh Court for the State oi Telaniana at Hyderabad. [OUTI 3 Two CD Copies CHR GJP tse
HIGH COURT
DATED:10 t04t2023
ORDER
W.P.No.27691 of 2007
.s
s*
L i".
,l
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
M/s. Prince Shoe Mart
The Authority Under Section 53 of the A.P. Shops and, Establishments Act 1988 and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-ll, Warangal
The Authority Under Section 50 of the A.P. Shops and, Establishments Act '1988 and Labour Officer, Warangal
Sri M. Sateesh
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
