Dismissed

Yedla Upendramma, Sec-Bad and Another, v. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport, Hyd and 2 Others

Telangana HC10 Apr 2023WP/5714/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana, while hearing a writ petition challenging inaction regarding appointment on compassionate grounds, dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to the unavailability of counsel representing the petitioners.

What did the court decide?

No relief granted; the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.

Yedla Upendramma, Sec-Bad and Another, Vs the… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE.OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD[ 3167 ] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THRE}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURAALE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 5714 OF 2007

¶6

Between:

¶7

, [3X1t"yo"Ak[]Tr, .w/o.y.L.N_arsaiah, Late, Housewife. c/o.t.p. Joet,

¶8

^n"sdNir-ril;.;6:"dfrfi^{Eiefde,tB".,fllB*0.,T_rJiJB"L;"H..k:"r;t"} 2. Yedta Venuoooai W..V.ar.ir;i#i:"'ff€: Unemptoyed, clo.i.p. .loer, Gen.Sec. &-Repr6sentativu, AFSHic-"i?, n"dlN".H.ri".i6,"cr,iriirs.i.j,,sl"",l,irE,o','i.eJiJl". jH?T:f p.union,

¶9

AND ...PETIT|oNERS

¶10

The Andhra pradesh gla^tgload Transport, Azamabad, Musheerabad,

¶11

^^{Hyderabad-pinCode:500020:-- -}

¶12

The Depot Manager, npSnft, Thorrur Bus Depot; Thom.rr, Warangal District, t ili""r$"#lmManager,^{APSRTC, warangat Region,warangatDistricr,}

¶13

perition under Articte 226 of the consrirution of tndia ,;#ir:t?],T",1: circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to pass such other order or orders, or direction more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring,the inaction on the part of the Respondents in considering the 2nd petitioner for the post of conductor or any other suitabre post in the 1st. Respondent corporati.n as iregar, arbitrary and violative of Articres 14, 1 g and 2'r of the constitution of rndia and consequenry to direct the respondents to consider the case of the 2nd.petitioner for appointment to the post of Conductor on compassionate grounds. NO 1 0F 2007 PMP. NO:7 287 0F 20071

¶14

Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the respondents to appoint the 2nd.petitioner as a condrrctor or any suitable post in the corporation add pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the petitioners: pARTy-tN_pERSON (NOT PRESENT)

¶15

Counsel for the Respondents: M/S. RAJINI REDDY

¶16

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶17

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No. s7t4 0F 2007

¶18

ORDER:

¶19

When the matt3r was taken up for hearing on 01.03.2O23, there !(.as no representation on behalf of the learned counsel fcrr the petitioners anci therefore the matter was directed to lte listed on O3.O4.2O23 under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called, there is no repreientation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner:.

¶20

Therefore, this Writ Pt tition is dismissed fcr non-prosecution. There shall be r c order as to costs.

¶21

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.

¶22

SD/- N. CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT.REGtSTRAR //TRUE COPY/I LtD SECTION OFFICER

¶23

To, 1. One CC to Sri Yedla Upendramma, W/o.Y.L.Narsaiah, Late, Occ: Housewife, C/o.l.P. Joel, Gen.Sec. &Representative, APSRTC Employee &^Workers Union, Regd.No.H.No.¹ 0, Chilkalguda, Secunderabad-Pin Code: 500061,A.P. (PARTY{N-PERSON) [OPUC] 2. One CC to M/s. Rajini Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶24

Two CD Copies CHR GJP

HIGH COURT

DATED:1010412023

ORDER

W.P.No.S714 of 2007

\r 1HE S147 t
t o
t
0 3 JUt'l 20n
'.:.-'.1..r. ,.'-
" -:t:;:_:--r; -"

¶30

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS

¶31

G;
*.-C----
-,4{"-,---.\ ^ .,-

Yedla Upendramma, Sec-Bad and Another, v. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport, Hyd and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yedla Upendramma, Sec-Bad and Another, v. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport, Hyd and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vemula Shankar, Vs The Singareni Collieries Company Limited

T. Hari Prasad, Secunderabad. Vs the a.P.Civil Supplies Corp.Ltd.,Rep.by Md., Hyderabad.

Avinav v Shah Vs Sri Rajashekar

M/s. Prince Shoe Mart, Vs The Authority Under Section 53 of the A.P. Shops and

P.Ganapathi, Nizamabad and 7 Vs Chairman, Npdc Ltd. and 3 Others

Siddaboina Radhika Vs Bairaboina Santhosh